Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27597835›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2016

No Effect of Featural Attention on Body Size Aftereffects.

Ian D Stephen, Chloe Bickersteth, Jonathan Mond, Richard J Stevenson, Kevin R Brooks

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Close encounters: Interpersonal proximity amplifies social appraisals.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The high-level basis of body adaptation.Royal Society open science · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ian D StephenDepartment of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSWAustralia; ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSWAustralia; Perception in Action Research Centre, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSWAustralia.
Chloe BickerstethDepartment of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW Australia.
Jonathan MondCentre for Health Research, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW Australia.
Richard J StevensonDepartment of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSWAustralia; Perception in Action Research Centre, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSWAustralia.
Kevin R BrooksDepartment of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSWAustralia; Perception in Action Research Centre, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSWAustralia.
Macquarie University · AUCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prolonged exposure to images of narrow bodies has been shown to induce a perceptual aftereffect, such that observers' point of subjective normality (PSN) for bodies shifts toward narrower bodies. The converse effect is shown for adaptation to wide bodies. In low-level stimuli, object attention (attention directed to the object) and spatial attention (attention directed to the location of the object) have been shown to increase the magnitude of visual aftereffects, while object-based attention enhances the adaptation effect in faces. It is not known whether featural attention (attention directed to a specific aspect of the object) affects the magnitude of adaptation effects in body stimuli. Here, we manipulate the attention of Caucasian observers to different featural information in body images, by asking them to rate the fatness or sex typicality of male and female bodies manipulated to appear fatter or thinner than average. PSNs for body fatness were taken at baseline and after adaptation, and a change in PSN (ΔPSN) was calculated. A body size adaptation effect was found, with observers who viewed fat bodies showing an increased PSN, and those exposed to thin bodies showing a reduced PSN. However, manipulations of featural attention to body fatness or sex typicality produced equivalent results, suggesting that featural attention may not affect the strength of the body size aftereffect.

Indexed as

adaptation aftereffectsbody fatnessbody perceptionbody size misperceptionfeatural attention

Identifiers

PMID27597835
PMCPMC4992704
OpenAlexW2517136207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.