Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27597437›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Geographic variation in wing size and shape of the grasshopper Trilophidia annulata (Orthoptera: Oedipodidae): morphological trait variations follow an ecogeographical rule.

Yi Bai, Jia-Jia Dong, De-Long Guan, Juan-Ying Xie, Sheng-Quan Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ancestral and local adaptation contribute to dispersal out of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in a bumblebee.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Bug off or bug out: mapping flight secrets ofFrontiers in insect science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Intraspecific variation in wing geometry amongFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yi BaiInstitute of Zoology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710062, P.R. China.
Jia-Jia DongInstitute of Zoology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710062, P.R. China.
De-Long GuanInstitute of Zoology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710062, P.R. China.
Juan-Ying XieSchool of Computer Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710062, P.R. China.
Sheng-Quan XuInstitute of Zoology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710062, P.R. China.
Institute of Zoology · CNShaanxi Normal University · CNTaizhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A quantitative analysis of wing variation in grasshoppers can help us to understand how environmental heterogeneity affects the phenotypic patterns of insects. In this study, geometric morphometric methods were used to measure the differences in wing shape and size of Trilophidia annulata among 39 geographical populations in China, and a regression analysis was applied to identify the major environmental factors contributing to the observed morphological variations. The results showed that the size of the forewing and hindwing were significantly different among populations; the shape of the forewing among populations can be divided into geographical groups, however hindwing shape are geographical overlapped, and populations cannot be divided into geographical groups. Environmental PCA and thin-plate spline analysis suggested that smaller individuals with shorter and blunter-tip forewings were mainly distributed in the lower latitudes and mountainous areas, where they have higher temperatures and more precipitation. Correspondingly, the larger-bodied grasshoppers, those that have longer forewings with a longer radial sector, are distributed in contrary circumstances. We conclude that the size variations in body, forewing and hindwing of T. annulata apparently follow the Bergmann clines. The importance of climatic variables in influencing morphological variation among populations, forewing shape of T. annulata varies along an environmental gradient.

Indexed as

EcologyGeographyAnimalsBody SizeGrasshoppersWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID27597437
PMCPMC5011697
OpenAlexW2507388805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.