Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27597137›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Sampling Hyperpolarized Molecules Utilizing a 1 Tesla Permanent Magnetic Field.

Sui Seng Tee, Valentina DiGialleonardo, Roozbeh Eskandari, Sangmoo Jeong, Kristin L Granlund, Vesselin Miloushev, Alex J Poot, Steven Truong, Julio A Alvarez, Hannah N Aldeborgh and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. AutomatedAnalytical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hyperpolarized [6-ACS chemical biology · 2019
    Article
  12. Hyperpolarized [1-Scientific reports · 2017
    Article
  13. Long-LivedThe journal of physical chemistry letters · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. HyperpolarizedJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sui Seng TeeDepartment of Radiology and Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Valentina DiGialleonardoDepartment of Radiology and Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Roozbeh EskandariDepartment of Radiology and Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Sangmoo JeongDepartment of Radiology and Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Kristin L GranlundDepartment of Radiology and Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Vesselin MiloushevDepartment of Radiology and Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Alex J PootDepartment of Radiology and Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Steven TruongHunter College, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Julio A AlvarezWeill Cornell Medical College, NY 10065, USA.
Hannah N AldeborghDepartment of Radiology and Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Kayvan R KeshariDepartment of Radiology and Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · USHunter College · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Human Tissue Culture Bioreactor and Hyperpolarized MR for Biomarker DiscoveryR00EB014328 · NIBIB · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI KESHARI, KAYVAN R · 2013 to 2015
$735k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB014328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperpolarized magnetic resonance spectroscopy (HP MRS) using dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) is a technique that has greatly enhanced the sensitivity of detecting (13)C nuclei. However, the HP MRS polarization decays in the liquid state according to the spin-lattice relaxation time (T1) of the nucleus. Sampling of the signal also destroys polarization, resulting in a limited temporal ability to observe biologically interesting reactions. In this study, we demonstrate that sampling hyperpolarized signals using a permanent magnet at 1 Tesla (1T) is a simple and cost-effective method to increase T1s without sacrificing signal-to-noise. Biologically-relevant information may be obtained with a permanent magnet using enzyme solutions and in whole cells. Of significance, our findings indicate that changes in pyruvate metabolism can also be quantified in a xenograft model at this field strength.

Indexed as

Magnetic FieldsAnimalsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticHumansLactic AcidMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDProstatic NeoplasmsPyruvic AcidSarcomaSirolimusTumor Cells, CulturedXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntibiotics, AntineoplasticLactic AcidPyruvic AcidSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID27597137
PMCPMC5011774
OpenAlexW2520052660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.