Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27596848›Full record

Trial reportDer Urologe. Ausg. A2017

[Nitroxoline - an option for the antibiotic treatment of urinary tract infections].

H Hof, D Bertsch, D Passek, R Schwarz

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H HofMVZ Labor Limbach, Im Breitspiel 15, 69126, Heidelberg, Deutschland. herbert.hof@labor-limbach.de.
D BertschMVZ Labor Limbach, Im Breitspiel 15, 69126, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
D PassekPraxis für Urologie, Hanau, Deutschland.
R SchwarzMVZ Labor Limbach, Im Breitspiel 15, 69126, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Klinikum Hanau · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResistance of uropathogenic bacteria against the common antibiotics is considerable-especially in the elderly.

objectivesIn Germany nitroxoline is licensed for the treatment of acute urinary tract infections and for prophylaxis of recurrent infections. What is the actual resistance pattern of uropathogenic bacteria? MATERIALS AND

methodsThe in vitro susceptibility of 477 uropathogenic bacteria from patients in 2015 was determined by means of the agar diffusion method.

resultsObviously, this agent is still active against the vast majority of uropathogenic bacteria and in particular against strains of Escherichia coli (E. coli). Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enterococci are not really within the spectrum of nitroxoline. One has to keep in mind, however, that even among E. coli and other enterobacteriaceae there are single resistant isolates. This applies in particular to problem strains resistant to many other antibiotics. DISCUSSION: Nitroxoline is a reasonable alternative and a promising option for calculated treatment of urinary tract infections-especially of the elderly, although this drug is not recommended in the current guideline. Laboratory testing of clinical isolates should be requested-at least when treatment fails.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Infective Agents, UrinaryBacteriaBacterial InfectionsHumansMiddle AgedNitroquinolinesTreatment OutcomeUrinary Tract InfectionsYoung AdultAnti-Infective Agents, UrinaryNitroquinolinesnitroxolineEnterobacteriaceaeEscherichia coliMultiresistant strainsPseudomonas aeruginosaUropathogenic bacteria

Identifiers

PMID27596848
OpenAlexW2514962867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.