Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27596573›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

What factors influence health professionals to use decision aids for Down syndrome prenatal screening?

Johanie Lépine, Maria Esther Leiva Portocarrero, Agathe Delanoë, Hubert Robitaille, Isabelle Lévesque, François Rousseau, Brenda J Wilson, Anik M C Giguère, France Légaré

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Access to Genetic Counselors in the Southern United States.Journal of personalized medicine · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johanie LépineCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation and Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada.
Maria Esther Leiva PortocarreroCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation and Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada.
Agathe DelanoëCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation and Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada.
Hubert RobitailleCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation and Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada.
Isabelle LévesqueDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.
François RousseauDepartment of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, and MSSS/FRQS/CHUQ Research Chair in Health Technology Assessment and Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine, Quebec, Canada.
Brenda J WilsonSchool of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Anik M C GiguèreQuebec Centre of Excellence on Aging, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada.
France LégaréCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation and Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada. france.legare@fmed.ulaval.ca.
Quebec Research and Development CentreUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth professionals are expected to engage pregnant women in shared decision making to help them make informed values-based decisions about prenatal screening. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) foster shared decision-making, but are rarely used in this context. Our objective was to identify factors that could influence health professionals to use a PtDA for decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome during a clinical pregnancy follow-up.

methodsWe planned to recruit a purposive sample of 45 health professionals (obstetrician-gynecologists, family physicians and midwives) involved in the care of pregnant women in three clinical sites (15 per site). Participating health professionals first watched a video showing two simulated consecutive prenatal follow-up consultations during which a pregnant woman, her partner and a health professional used a PtDA about Down syndrome prenatal screening. Participants were then interviewed about factors that would influence their use of the PtDA. Questions were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework. We performed content analyses of transcribed verbatim interviews.

resultsOut of 42 eligible health professionals approached, 36 agreed to be interviewed (86 % response rate). Of these, 27 were female (75 %), nine were obstetrician-gynecologists (25 %), 15 were family physicians (42 %), and 12 were midwives (33 %), with a mean age of 42.1 ± 11.6 years old. We identified 35 distinct factors reported by 20 % or more participants that were mapped onto 10 of the 12 of the Theoretical Domains Framework domains. The six most frequently mentioned factors influencing use of the PtDA were: 1) a positive appraisal (n = 29, 81 %, beliefs about consequences domain); 2) its availability in the office (n = 27, 75 %, environmental context and resources domain); 3) colleagues' approval (n = 27, 75 %, social influences domain); 4) time constraints (n = 26, 72 %, environmental context and resources domain); 5) finding it a relevant source of information (n = 24, 67 %, motivation and goals domain); and 6) not knowing any PtDAs (n = 23, 64 %, knowledge domain).

conclusionsAppraisal, PtDA availability, peer approval, time concerns, evidence and PtDA awareness all affect whether health professionals are likely to use a PtDA to help pregnant women make informed decision about Down syndrome screening. Implementation strategies will need to address these factors.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultDecision MakingDown SyndromeFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisReferral and ConsultationDown syndromeFamily physiciansHealth professionalsMidwivesObstetrician-gynecologistsPatient decision aidsPrenatal screeningShared decision makingTheoretical Domains Framework

Identifiers

PMID27596573
PMCPMC5011951
OpenAlexW2513665405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.