Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27596356›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Gamma radiation at a human relevant low dose rate is genotoxic in mice.

Anne Graupner, Dag M Eide, Christine Instanes, Jill M Andersen, Dag A Brede, Stephen D Dertinger, Ole C Lind, Anicke Brandt-Kjelsen, Hans Bjerke, Brit Salbu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. DNA repair after oxidative stress: current challenges.Current opinion in toxicology · 2018
    Article
  13. Role of Ionizing Radiation in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne GraupnerDepartment of Chemicals and Radiation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo 0403, Norway.
Dag M EideDepartment of Chemicals and Radiation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo 0403, Norway.
Christine InstanesDepartment of Chemicals and Radiation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo 0403, Norway.
Jill M AndersenDepartment of Chemicals and Radiation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo 0403, Norway.
Dag A BredeCentre for Environmental Radioactivity (CoE CERAD), Ås 1432, Norway.
Stephen D DertingerLitron Laboratories, Rochester, NY 14623, United States.
Ole C LindCentre for Environmental Radioactivity (CoE CERAD), Ås 1432, Norway.
Anicke Brandt-KjelsenDepartment of Environmental Sciences (IMV), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Centre for Environmental Radioactivity (CoE CERAD), Ås 1432, Norway.
Hans BjerkeDepartment of Monitoring and Research, Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, Østerås 1332, Norway.
Brit SalbuCentre for Environmental Radioactivity (CoE CERAD), Ås 1432, Norway.
Deborah OughtonCentre for Environmental Radioactivity (CoE CERAD), Ås 1432, Norway.
Gunnar BrunborgDepartment of Chemicals and Radiation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo 0403, Norway.
Ann K OlsenDepartment of Chemicals and Radiation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo 0403, Norway.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NONorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOLitron Laboratories (United States) · USNorwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority · NO

Funding

Validation of a Rodent Mutagenicity AssayR44ES018017 · NIEHS · LITRON LABORATORIES, LTD. · PI DERTINGER, STEPHEN D · 2010 to 2012
$1.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS R44 ES018017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even today, 70 years after Hiroshima and accidents like in Chernobyl and Fukushima, we still have limited knowledge about the health effects of low dose rate (LDR) radiation. Despite their human relevance after occupational and accidental exposure, only few animal studies on the genotoxic effects of chronic LDR radiation have been performed. Selenium (Se) is involved in oxidative stress defence, protecting DNA and other biomolecules from reactive oxygen species (ROS). It is hypothesised that Se deficiency, as it occurs in several parts of the world, may aggravate harmful effects of ROS-inducing stressors such as ionising radiation. We performed a study in the newly established LDR-facility Figaro on the combined effects of Se deprivation and LDR γ exposure in DNA repair knockout mice (Ogg1(-/-)) and control animals (Ogg1(+/-)). Genotoxic effects were seen after continuous radiation (1.4 mGy/h) for 45 days. Chromosomal damage (micronucleus), phenotypic mutations (Pig-a gene mutation of RBC(CD24-)) and DNA lesions (single strand breaks/alkali labile sites) were significantly increased in blood cells of irradiated animals, covering three types of genotoxic activity. This study demonstrates that chronic LDR γ radiation is genotoxic in an exposure scenario realistic for humans, supporting the hypothesis that even LDR γ radiation may induce cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood CellsDNA DamageDNA GlycosylasesDNA RepairDose-Response Relationship, RadiationGamma RaysHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMutationOxidative StressReactive Oxygen SpeciesSeleniumDNA GlycosylasesOgg1 protein, mouseReactive Oxygen SpeciesSelenium

Identifiers

PMID27596356
PMCPMC5011728
OpenAlexW2510982489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.