Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27596251›Full record

ArticleHearing research2016

Speech perception adjusts to stable spectrotemporal properties of the listening environment.

Christian E Stilp, Paul W Anderson, Ashley A Assgari, Gregory M Ellis, Pavel Zahorik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christian E StilpDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA. Electronic address: christian.stilp@louisville.edu.
Paul W AndersonDepartment of Psychology, Murray State University, Murray, KY, 42071, USA. Electronic address: panderson9@murraystate.edu.
Ashley A AssgariDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA. Electronic address: ashley.assgari@louisville.edu.
Gregory M EllisDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA. Electronic address: g.ellis@louisville.edu.
Pavel ZahorikDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA. Electronic address: pavel.zahorik@louisville.edu.

Funding

Perceptual processing of indirect soundR01DC008168 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI ZAHORIK, PAVEL A · 2007 to 2011
$1.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When perceiving speech, listeners compensate for reverberation and stable spectral peaks in the speech signal. Despite natural listening conditions usually adding both reverberation and spectral coloration, these processes have only been studied separately. Reverberation smears spectral peaks across time, which is predicted to increase listeners' compensation for these peaks. This prediction was tested using sentences presented with or without a simulated reverberant sound field. All sentences had a stable spectral peak (added by amplifying frequencies matching the second formant frequency [F

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionPhoneticsSpeech AcousticsSpeech PerceptionCalibrationEnvironmentHumansLanguageNoisePsychometricsRegression AnalysisSound SpectrographyTime FactorsPerceptual constancyReverberationSpectral calibrationSpeech perception

Identifiers

PMID27596251
PMCPMC5086439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.