Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27596066›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2016

Unravelling the factors decisive to the implementation of EPODE-derived community approaches targeting childhood obesity: a longitudinal, multiple case study.

Maria Rianne van der Kleij, Mathilde Crone, Ria Reis, Theo Paulussen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria Rianne van der KleijDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Postbus 9600 zone V-0-P, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands. m.j.j.van_der_kleij@lumc.nl.
Mathilde CroneDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Postbus 9600 zone V-0-P, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands.
Ria ReisDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Postbus 9600 zone V-0-P, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands.
Theo PaulussenAcademic Workplace (AWP) Public Health Zuid-Holland Noord, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementation of intersectoral community approaches often fails due to a translational gap between the approach as intended and the approach as implemented in practice. Knowledge about the implementation determinants of such approaches is needed to facilitate future implementation processes.

methodsThe implementation of five EPODE-derived intersectoral community approaches was studied longitudinally. Semi-structured interviews were held with 189 community stakeholders from four sectors to elucidate which determinants influenced implementation, and if an to which extent determinants differed across communities, sectors and over time. A framework approach was used to analyze our data.

resultsTwenty-two key determinants of implementation were identified. Facilitators named were mostly proximal (stakeholder level), and barriers were mostly distal (context level). Key determinants varied greatly across sectors and over time, especially between the educational & health care sector and the private, welfare & sports sector. Only 'perceived importance of IACO goals' was identified as an universal implementation facilitator.

conclusionsStriking differences in determinants were found across sectors and over time. Also, stakeholders expressed that possibilities to adapt the approach to the local context were needed to improve implementation. We therefore propose to develop sector- and time specific leads for implementation, which should be approved and amended (over time) by stakeholders. This so-called 'mutual adaptation' allows for the use of both scientific insights and practice-based knowledge, enabling program management and community stakeholders to collaboratively improve their implementation efforts.

Indexed as

Health Plan ImplementationProgram DevelopmentResidence CharacteristicsAttitudeChildCooperative BehaviorGoalsHumansLongitudinal StudiesNetherlandsOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePediatric ObesityChildrenCommunity approachImplementationIntersectoral collaborationObesity preventionProcess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID27596066
PMCPMC5011896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.