Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27595837›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2017

Imaging algorithms and CT protocols in trauma patients: survey of Swiss emergency centers.

R Hinzpeter, T Boehm, D Boll, C Constantin, F Del Grande, V Fretz, S Leschka, T Ohletz, M Brönnimann, S Schmidt and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Acute aortic syndromes and aortic emergencies.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

R HinzpeterInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistr. 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
T BoehmDepartment of Radiology, Kantonsspital Graubuenden, Chur, Switzerland.
D BollDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
C ConstantinDepartment of Radiology, Spital Wallis, Visp, Switzerland.
F Del GrandeDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.
V FretzInstitute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
S LeschkaDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kantonsspital St Gallen, Gallen, Switzerland.
T OhletzDepartment of Radiology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
M BrönnimannDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
S SchmidtDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
T TreumannInstitute of Radiology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern 16, Switzerland.
P-A PolettiDepartment of Radiology, Geneva University Hospital, Genève, Switzerland.
Hatem AlkadhiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistr. 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland. hatem.alkadhi@usz.ch.
University Hospital of Zurich · CHKantonsspital Aarau · CHKantonsspital Graubünden · CHKantonsspital St. Gallen · CHKantonsspital Winterthur · CHLuzerner Kantonsspital · CHOspedale regionale di Lugano · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify imaging algorithms and indications, CT protocols, and radiation doses in polytrauma patients in Swiss trauma centres.

methodsAn online survey with multiple choice questions and free-text responses was sent to authorized level-I trauma centres in Switzerland.

resultsAll centres responded and indicated that they have internal standardized imaging algorithms for polytrauma patients. Nine of 12 centres (75 %) perform whole-body CT (WBCT) after focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) and conventional radiography; 3/12 (25 %) use WBCT for initial imaging. Indications for WBCT were similar across centres being based on trauma mechanisms, vital signs, and presence of multiple injuries. Seven of 12 centres (58 %) perform an arterial and venous phase of the abdomen in split-bolus technique. Six of 12 centres (50 %) use multiphase protocols of the head (n = 3) and abdomen (n = 4), whereas 6/12 (50 %) use single-phase protocols for WBCT. Arm position was on the patient`s body during scanning (3/12, 25 %), alongside the body (2/12, 17 %), above the head (2/12, 17 %), or was changed during scanning (5/12, 42 %). Radiation doses showed large variations across centres ranging from 1268-3988 mGy*cm (DLP) per WBCT.

conclusionsImaging algorithms in polytrauma patients are standardized within, but vary across Swiss trauma centres, similar to the individual WBCT protocols, resulting in large variations in associated radiation doses. KEY POINTS: • Swiss trauma centres have internal standardized imaging algorithms for trauma patients • Whole-body CT is most commonly used for imaging of trauma patients • CT protocols and radiation doses vary greatly across Swiss trauma centres.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsClinical ProtocolsEmergency Medical ServicesHumansMultiple TraumaRadiation DosageSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandTomography, X-Ray ComputedTrauma CentersWhole Body ImagingAlgorithmComputed tomographyImagingRadiationTrauma

Identifiers

PMID27595837
OpenAlexW2515486805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.