Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27595054›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental studies and sciences2016

Analyzing Patterns of Community Interest at a Legacy Mining Waste Site to Assess and Inform Environmental Health Literacy Efforts.

Monica D Ramirez-Andreotta, Nathan Lothrop, Sarah T Wilkinson, Robert A Root, Janick F Artiola, Walter Klimecki, Miranda Loh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental studies and sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Public Participation, Trust and Data Sharing: Gardens as Hubs for Citizen Science and Environmental Health Literacy Efforts.International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement · 2019
    Article
  12. Increasing Environmental Health Literacy through Contextual Learning in Communities at Risk.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. From Content Knowledge to Community Change: A Review of Representations of Environmental Health Literacy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Improving Environmental Health Literacy and Justice through Environmental Exposure Results Communication.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
  17. Reporting back environmental exposure data and free choice learning.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monica D Ramirez-AndreottaDepartment of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, The University of Arizona. Tucson, Arizona 85721.
Nathan LothropMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona. Tucson, Arizona 85721.
Sarah T WilkinsonSuperfund Research Program, The University of Arizona. Tucson, Arizona 85721.
Robert A RootDepartment of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, The University of Arizona. Tucson, Arizona 85721; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, The University of Arizona. Tucson, Arizona 85721.
Janick F ArtiolaDepartment of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, The University of Arizona. Tucson, Arizona 85721.
Walter KlimeckiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, The University of Arizona. Tucson, Arizona 85721.
Miranda LohMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona. Tucson, Arizona 85721.

Funding

TRANSPORT OF TRACE METALS IN A POLLUTED AQUIFERP42ES004940 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Bernardo Lemos · 1990 to 2026
$68.1M
SOUTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES CENTERP30ES006694 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Paloma Inés Beamer · 1994 to 2026
$36.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES006694NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding a community's concerns and informational needs is crucial to conducting and improving environmental health research and literacy initiatives. We hypothesized that analysis of community inquiries over time at a legacy mining site would be an effective method for assessing environmental health literacy efforts and determining whether community concerns were thoroughly addressed. Through a qualitative analysis, we determined community concerns at the time of being listed as a Superfund site. We analyzed how community concerns changed from this starting point over the subsequent years, and whether: 1) communication materials produced by the USEPA and other media were aligned with community concerns; and 2) these changes demonstrated a progression of the community's understanding resulting from community involvement and engaged research efforts. We observed that when the Superfund site was first listed, community members were most concerned with USEPA management, remediation, site-specific issues, health effects, and environmental monitoring efforts related to air/dust and water. Over the next five years, community inquiries shifted significantly to include exposure assessment and reduction methods and issues unrelated to the site, particularly the local public water supply and home water treatment systems. Such documentation of community inquiries over time at contaminated sites is a novel method to assess environmental health literacy efforts and determine whether community concerns were thoroughly addressed.

Indexed as

community engaged researchcommunity engagementenvironmental health literacyhazardous waste sitelegacy mining wasteSuperfund Site

Identifiers

PMID27595054
PMCPMC5007004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.