Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27594995›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2016

Predictors of successful non-operative management of grade III & IV blunt pancreatic trauma.

Suman B Koganti, Ravikanth Kongara, Sateesh Boddepalli, Naushad Shaik Mohammad, Venumadhav Thumma, Bheerappa Nagari, R A Sastry

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Pancreatic fracture: a rare complication following scoliosis surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suman B KogantiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Telangana (Andhra Pradesh), 500082, India.
Ravikanth KongaraDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Telangana (Andhra Pradesh), 500082, India.
Sateesh BoddepalliDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Telangana (Andhra Pradesh), 500082, India.
Naushad Shaik MohammadDepartment of Bio-statistics & Pharmacogenomics, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Telangana (Andhra Pradesh), 500082, India.
Venumadhav ThummaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Telangana (Andhra Pradesh), 500082, India.
Bheerappa NagariDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Telangana (Andhra Pradesh), 500082, India.
R A SastryDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Telangana (Andhra Pradesh), 500082, India.
Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough surgery is the preferred treatment for grade III&IV pancreatic trauma, there is a growing movement for non-operative management. in blunt pancreatic trauma. Very few studies compare operative versus non-operative management in adult patients.

methodsRetrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed from 2004 to 2013 in the department of gastrointestinal surgery, NIMS, Hyderabad. Comparative analysis was performed between patients who failed versus those who were successfully managed with non-operative management.

results34 patients had grade III/IV trauma out of which 8 were operated early with the remaining 26 initially under a NOM strategy, 10 of them could be successfully managed without any operation. Post-traumatic pancreatitis, Necrotizing pancreatitis, Ileus, contusion on CT, surrounding organ injuries are independently associated with failure of NOM on a univariate analysis. On multivariate logistic regression presence of necrosis& associated organ injury are factors that predict failure of NOM independently. Development of a pseudocyst is the only significant factor that is associated with a success of NOM.

conclusionsNon-operative measures should be attempted in a select group of grade III&IV blunt pancreatic trauma. In hemodynamically stable patients with a controlled leak walled off as a pseudocyst without associated organ injuries and pancreatic necrosis, NOM has a higher success rate.

Indexed as

AAST: American association for the surgery of traumaISGPF: International study group of pancreatic fistulaNOM: non-operative management

Identifiers

PMID27594995
PMCPMC4995476
OpenAlexW2487191147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.