Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27594820›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2016

COINSTAC: A Privacy Enabled Model and Prototype for Leveraging and Processing Decentralized Brain Imaging Data.

Sergey M Plis, Anand D Sarwate, Dylan Wood, Christopher Dieringer, Drew Landis, Cory Reed, Sandeep R Panta, Jessica A Turner, Jody M Shoemaker, Kim W Carter and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Privacy-Preserving Visualization of Brain Functional Connectivity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. PRIVACY-PRESERVING VISUALIZATION OF BRAIN FUNCTIONAL NETWORK CONNECTIVITY.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2024
    Article
  20. Federated Privacy-Preserving Visualization: A Vision Paper.Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sergey M PlisThe Mind Research Network, Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Anand D SarwateDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Dylan WoodThe Mind Research Network, Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Christopher DieringerThe Mind Research Network, Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Drew LandisThe Mind Research Network, Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Cory ReedThe Mind Research Network, Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Sandeep R PantaThe Mind Research Network, Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Jessica A TurnerThe Mind Research Network, Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research InstituteAlbuquerque, NM, USA; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State UniversityAtlanta, GA, USA.
Jody M ShoemakerThe Mind Research Network, Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Kim W CarterTelethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia Subiaco, WA, Australia.
Paul ThompsonDepartments of Neurology, Psychiatry, Engineering, Radiology, and Pediatrics, Imaging Genetics Center, Enhancing Neuroimaging and Genetics through Meta-Analysis Center for Worldwide Medicine, Imaging, and Genomics, University of Southern California Marina del Rey, CA, USA.
Kent HutchisonDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder Boulder, CO, USA.
Vince D CalhounThe Mind Research Network, Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research InstituteAlbuquerque, NM, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New MexicoAlbuquerque, NM, USA.

Funding

COINSTAC: Decentralized, Scalable Analysis of Loosely Coupled DataR01DA040487 · NIDA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D, PLIS, SERGEY · 2015 to 2024
$7.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of neuroimaging has embraced the need for sharing and collaboration. Data sharing mandates from public funding agencies and major journal publishers have spurred the development of data repositories and neuroinformatics consortia. However, efficient and effective data sharing still faces several hurdles. For example, open data sharing is on the rise but is not suitable for sensitive data that are not easily shared, such as genetics. Current approaches can be cumbersome (such as negotiating multiple data sharing agreements). There are also significant data transfer, organization and computational challenges. Centralized repositories only partially address the issues. We propose a dynamic, decentralized platform for large scale analyses called the Collaborative Informatics and Neuroimaging Suite Toolkit for Anonymous Computation (COINSTAC). The COINSTAC solution can include data missing from central repositories, allows pooling of both open and "closed" repositories by developing privacy-preserving versions of widely-used algorithms, and incorporates the tools within an easy-to-use platform enabling distributed computation. We present an initial prototype system which we demonstrate on two multi-site data sets, without aggregating the data. In addition, by iterating across sites, the COINSTAC model enables meta-analytic solutions to converge to "pooled-data" solutions (i.e., as if the entire data were in hand). More advanced approaches such as feature generation, matrix factorization models, and preprocessing can be incorporated into such a model. In sum, COINSTAC enables access to the many currently unavailable data sets, a user friendly privacy enabled interface for decentralized analysis, and a powerful solution that complements existing data sharing solutions.

Indexed as

brain imagingdata sharingdecentralized algorithmsdecentralized processingprivacy

Identifiers

PMID27594820
PMCPMC4990563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.