Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27594686›Full record

ArticleAutonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical2016

Complex and interacting influences of the autonomic nervous system on cardiac electrophysiology in conscious mice.

Heidi L Lujan, Joshua P Rivers, Stephen E DiCarlo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome-wide association study-identified novel genetic loci for QT interval in Taiwan: implications for population-specific arrhythmia risk.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chronic, complete cervicalJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heidi L LujanWayne State University School of Medicine, Department of Physiology, 540 E. Canfield Ave, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. Electronic address: hlujan@med.wayne.edu.
Joshua P RiversWayne State University School of Medicine, Department of Physiology, 540 E. Canfield Ave, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. Electronic address: jrivers@med.wayne.edu.
Stephen E DiCarloWayne State University School of Medicine, Department of Physiology, 540 E. Canfield Ave, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. Electronic address: sdicarlo@med.wayne.edu.

Funding

Vagal Plasticity after Cord Injury Exacerbates Post-Infarct Cardiac RemodelingR01HL122223 · NHLBI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DICARLO, STEPHEN E · 2015 to 2018
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL122223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mice may now be the preferred animal model for biomedical research due to its anatomical, physiological, and genetic similarity to humans. However, little is known about accentuated antagonism of chronotropic and dromotropic properties in conscious mice. Accordingly, we describe the complex and interacting influence of the autonomic nervous system on cardiac electrophysiology in conscious mice. Specifically, we report the effects of single and combined cardiac autonomic blockade on measurements of pulse interval (heart rate), atrio-ventricular interval, sinus node recovery time (SNRT), SNRT corrected for spontaneous sinus cycle, and Wenckebach cycle length in conscious mice free of the confounding influences of anesthetics and surgical trauma. Autonomic influences were quantified as the change in parameter induced by its selective blocker (Sympathetic or Parasympathetic Effect) or as the difference between the intrinsic value and the value after a selective blocker (Sympathetic or Parasympathetic Tonus). Sympatho-Vagal Balance (SVB) was assessed as the ratio of control interval to intrinsic interval. SVB suggests slight parasympathetic dominance in the control of cardiac electrophysiology intervals. Furthermore, results documents a complex interaction between the sympathetic and parasympathetic divisions of the autonomic nervous system in the control of cardiac electrophysiology parameters. Specifically, the parasympathetic effect was greater than the parasympathetic tonus in the control of cardiac electrophysiology parameters. In contrast, the sympathetic effect was smaller than the sympathetic tonus in the control of cardiac electrophysiology parameters. Results have important implications because actions of pharmacological agents that alter the autonomic control of cardiac electrophysiology are transformed by these interacting mechanisms.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAnimalsAutonomic Nervous SystemElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryHeartHeart RateMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMuscarinic AntagonistsParasympathetic Nervous SystemTelemetryAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsMuscarinic AntagonistsAtrio-ventricular intervalElectrocardiogramParasympatheticSinus node recovery timeSympatheticWenckebach cycle length

Identifiers

PMID27594686
PMCPMC5108678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.