Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27594587›Full record

ArticleStem cell reports2016

Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Versatile, Predictable, and Donor-Free Gene Knockout in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Zhongliang Liu, Yi Hui, Lei Shi, Zhenyu Chen, Xiangjie Xu, Liankai Chi, Beibei Fan, Yujiang Fang, Yang Liu, Lin Ma and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhongliang LiuShanghai Tenth People's Hospital, and Neuroregeneration Key Laboratory of Shanghai Universities, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China.
Yi HuiDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, the Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, 19 Qixiu Road, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China.
Lei ShiCollege of Animal Science and Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Zhenyu ChenShanghai Tenth People's Hospital, and Neuroregeneration Key Laboratory of Shanghai Universities, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China.
Xiangjie XuShanghai Tenth People's Hospital, and Neuroregeneration Key Laboratory of Shanghai Universities, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China.
Liankai ChiShanghai Tenth People's Hospital, and Neuroregeneration Key Laboratory of Shanghai Universities, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China.
Beibei FanShanghai Tenth People's Hospital, and Neuroregeneration Key Laboratory of Shanghai Universities, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China.
Yujiang FangShanghai Tenth People's Hospital, and Neuroregeneration Key Laboratory of Shanghai Universities, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China.
Yang LiuShanghai Tenth People's Hospital, and Neuroregeneration Key Laboratory of Shanghai Universities, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China.
Lin MaShanghai Tenth People's Hospital, and Neuroregeneration Key Laboratory of Shanghai Universities, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China.
Yiran WangShanghai Tenth People's Hospital, and Neuroregeneration Key Laboratory of Shanghai Universities, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China.
Lei XiaoCollege of Animal Science and Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Quanbin ZhangShanghai Tenth People's Hospital, and Neuroregeneration Key Laboratory of Shanghai Universities, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China.
Guohua JinDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, the Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, 19 Qixiu Road, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China. Electronic address: jguohua@ntu.edu.cn.
Ling LiuShanghai Tenth People's Hospital, and Neuroregeneration Key Laboratory of Shanghai Universities, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China; Tongji University Advanced Institute of Translational Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China. Electronic address: lliu@tongji.edu.cn.
Xiaoqing ZhangShanghai Tenth People's Hospital, and Neuroregeneration Key Laboratory of Shanghai Universities, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China; Tongji University Advanced Institute of Translational Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China; The Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China. Electronic address: xqzhang@tongji.edu.cn.
Tongji University · CNShanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CNNantong University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss-of-function studies in human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) require efficient methodologies for lesion of genes of interest. Here, we introduce a donor-free paired gRNA-guided CRISPR/Cas9 knockout strategy (paired-KO) for efficient and rapid gene ablation in hPSCs. Through paired-KO, we succeeded in targeting all genes of interest with high biallelic targeting efficiencies. More importantly, during paired-KO, the cleaved DNA was repaired mostly through direct end joining without insertions/deletions (precise ligation), and thus makes the lesion product predictable. The paired-KO remained highly efficient for one-step targeting of multiple genes and was also efficient for targeting of microRNA, while for long non-coding RNA over 8 kb, cleavage of a short fragment of the core promoter region was sufficient to eradicate downstream gene transcription. This work suggests that the paired-KO strategy is a simple and robust system for loss-of-function studies for both coding and non-coding genes in hPSCs.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene Knockout TechniquesBase Sequencebeta CateninCell DifferentiationCell LineEmbryonic Stem CellsGene TargetingHumansPluripotent Stem CellsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsRNA, Long NoncodingSmad3 Proteinbeta CateninCTNNB1 protein, humanRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsRNA, Long NoncodingSmad3 ProteinCRISPR/Cas9gene editinghuman pluripotent stem cellsnon-coding RNA

Identifiers

PMID27594587
PMCPMC5032288
OpenAlexW2511824659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.