Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27594276›Full record

ReviewThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2016

Statins for aortic valve stenosis.

Luciana Thiago, Selma Rumiko Tsuji, Jonathan Nyong, Maria Es Puga, Aecio Ft Gois, Cristiane R Macedo, Orsine Valente, Álvaro N Atallah

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05062239 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and the Influence of Statins - Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLars Peter RiberRan2022 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsPostoperative Atrial FibrillationArmsDiscontinuance of treatment with statins 7 to 14 days prior to surgery until 30 days postoperative, No-intervention.
NCT05076019 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Statin Therapy With Atorvastatin in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2022 to 2027Enrolled266ConditionsPostoperative Atrial FibrillationArmsAtorvastatin 80mg, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quantifying the Age of Evidence: Lessons From Cardiovascular Drugs.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Detecting native and bioprosthetic aortic valve disease usingJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Statins for aortic valve stenosis.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Luciana ThiagoDepartment of Education in Health Sciences, Marilia Medical School, Marilia, Brazil.
Selma Rumiko Tsuji
Jonathan Nyong
Maria Es Puga
Aecio Ft Gois
Cristiane R Macedo
Orsine Valente
Álvaro N Atallah
Cochrane · BRFaculdade de Medicina de Marília · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAortic valve stenosis is the most common type of valvular heart disease in the USA and Europe. Aortic valve stenosis is considered similar to atherosclerotic disease. Some studies have evaluated statins for aortic valve stenosis.

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of statins in aortic valve stenosis. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS - IBECS, Web of Science and CINAHL Plus. These databases were searched from their inception to 24 November 2015. We also searched trials in registers for ongoing trials. We used no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) comparing statins alone or in association with other systemic drugs to reduce cholesterol levels versus placebo or usual care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Primary outcomes were severity of aortic valve stenosis (evaluated by echocardiographic criteria: mean pressure gradient, valve area and aortic jet velocity), freedom from valve replacement and death from cardiovascular cause. Secondary outcomes were hospitalisation for any reason, overall mortality, adverse events and patient quality of life.Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The GRADE methodology was employed to assess the quality of result findings and the GRADE profiler (GRADEPRO) was used to import data from Review Manager 5.3 to create a 'Summary of findings' table. MAIN

resultsWe included four RCTs with 2360 participants comparing statins (1185 participants) with placebo (1175 participants). We found low-quality evidence for our primary outcome of severity of aortic valve stenosis, evaluated by mean pressure gradient (mean difference (MD) -0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.88 to 0.80; participants = 1935; studies = 2), valve area (MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.14; participants = 127; studies = 2), and aortic jet velocity (MD -0.06, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.14; participants = 155; study = 1). Moderate-quality evidence showed no effect on freedom from valve replacement with statins (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.06; participants = 2360; studies = 4), and no effect on muscle pain as an adverse event (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.09; participants = 2204; studies = 3; moderate-quality evidence). Low- and very low-quality evidence showed uncertainty around the effect of statins on death from cardiovascular cause (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.15; participants = 2297; studies = 3; low-quality evidence) and hospitalisation for any reason (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.84; participants = 155; study = 1; very low-quality evidence). None of the four included studies reported on overall mortality and patient quality of life. AUTHORS'

conclusionsResult findings showed uncertainty surrounding the effect of statins for aortic valve stenosis.The quality of evidence from the reported outcomes ranged from moderate to very low. These results give support to European and USA guidelines (2012 and 2014, respectively) that so far there is no clinical treatment option for aortic valve stenosis.

Identifiers

PMID27594276
PMCPMC6457620
OpenAlexW1829356702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.