Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27593969›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2016

Risk-factors for methadone-specific deaths in Scotland's methadone-prescription clients between 2009 and 2013.

Lu Gao, Polyxeni Dimitropoulou, J Roy Robertson, Stuart McTaggart, Marion Bennie, Sheila M Bird

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The opioid problem in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lu GaoMRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge CB2 0SR, United Kingdom.
Polyxeni DimitropoulouMRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge CB2 0SR, United Kingdom.
J Roy RobertsonUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh University, EDINBURGH EH16 4UX, United Kingdom.
Stuart McTaggartInformation Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh EH12 9EB, United Kingdom.
Marion BennieInformation Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh EH12 9EB, United Kingdom; Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, United Kingdom.
Sheila M BirdMRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge CB2 0SR, United Kingdom; Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Strathclyde University, Glasgow G1 1XH, United Kingdom. Electronic address: sheila.bird@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk.
MRC Biostatistics Unit · GBUniversity of Strathclyde · GBNational Health Service Scotland · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_13040Medical Research Council MR/K007017/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo quantify gender, age-group and quantity of methadone prescribed as risk factors for drugs-related deaths (DRDs), and for methadone-specific DRDs, in Scotland's methadone-prescription clients.

designLinkage to death-records for Scotland's methadone-clients with one or more Community Health Index (CHI)-identified methadone prescriptions during July 2009 to June 2013.

settingScotland's Prescribing Information System and National Records of Scotland. MEASUREMENTS: Covariates defined at first CHI-identified methadone prescription, and person-years at-risk (pys) thereafter until the earlier of death-date or 31 December 2013. Methadone-specific DRDs were defined as: methadone implicated but neither heroin nor buprenorphine. Hazard ratios (HRs) were assessed using proportional hazards regression.

findingsScotland's CHI-identified methadone-prescription cohort comprised 33,128 clients, 121,254 pys, 1,171 non-DRDs and 760 DRDs (6.3 per 1,000 pys), of which 362 were methadone-specific. Irrespective of gender, methadone-specific DRD-rate, per 1,000 pys, was higher in the 35+ age-group (4.2; 95% CI: 3.6-4.7) than for younger clients (1.9; 95% CI: 1.5-2.2). For methadone-specific DRDs, age-related HRs (e.g., 2.9 at 45+ years; 95% CI: 2.1-3.9) were steeper than for all DRDs (1.9; 95% CI: 1.5-2.4); there was no hazard-reduction for females; no gender by age-group interaction; and, unlike for all DRDs, the highest quintile for quantity of prescribed methadone at cohort-entry (>1960mg) was associated with increased HR (1.8; 95% CI: 1.3-2.5).

conclusionHigher methadone-specific DRD rates in older clients, irrespective of gender, call for better understanding of methadone's pharmaco-dynamics in older, opioid-dependent clients, many with progressive physical or mental ill-health.

Indexed as

Opiate Substitution TreatmentAdultAge FactorsAnalgesics, OpioidCause of DeathFemaleHeroin DependenceHumansMaleMethadoneMiddle AgedRisk FactorsScotlandSuicideYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidMethadoneAge-groupDaily-doseDeathsDrugs-relatedGenderMethadone-specificPrescribed-methadoneQuantityQuintilesRisk-factors

Identifiers

PMID27593969
PMCPMC5047032
OpenAlexW2517731818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.