Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27593861›Full record

ArticleYonsei medical journal2016

Lack of Superiority for Soluble ST2 over High Sensitive C-Reactive Protein in Predicting High Risk Coronary Artery Calcium Score in a Community Cohort.

Jaewon Oh, Sungha Park, Hee Tae Yu, Hyuk Jae Chang, Sang Hak Lee, Seok Min Kang, Donghoon Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. sST2 levels and 3D speckle tracking as predictors of CAD severity in chronic coronary syndrome.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jaewon OhCardiology Division, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sungha ParkCardiology Division, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. shpark0530@yuhs.ac.
Hee Tae YuCardiology Division, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hyuk Jae ChangCardiology Division, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sang Hak LeeCardiology Division, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seok Min KangCardiology Division, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Donghoon ChoiCardiology Division, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSoluble ST2 (sST2) is an emerging prognostic biomarker in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). A recent study showed that sST2 predicted incident hypertension. High sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) has been a widely-used biomarker for risk-stratifying in CVD. We compared the abilities of sST2 and hsCRP to predict high risk coronary artery calcium score (CACS). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe CACS was assessed by cardiac computed tomography, and sST2 was measured in 456 subjects enrolled in the Mapo-gu community cohort. In accordance with the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines, we defined the high risk CACS group as individuals with a CACS ≥300 Agatston units (AU).

resultsThere were 99 (21.7%) subjects with a CACS ≥300 AU. There was a strong correlation between log sST2 and log hsCRP (r=0.128, p=0.006), and both log sST2 and log hsCRP showed significant associations with CACS (r=0.101, p=0.031 for sST2, r=0.101, p=0.032 for hsCRP). In net reclassification improvement (NRI) analysis, the NRI for hsCRP over sST2 was significant [continuous NRI 0.238, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.001-0.474, integrated discrimination index (IDI) 0.022, p=0.035], while the NRI for sST2 over hsCRP was not significant (continuous NRI 0.212, 95% CI -0.255-0.453, IDI 0.002, p=0.269).

conclusionsST2 does not improve net reclassification for predicting a high risk CACS. Using hsCRP provides superior discrimination and risk reclassification for coronary atherosclerosis, compared with sST2.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersCalciumComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansInterleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 ProteinMaleMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillancePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisBiomarkersCalciumC-Reactive ProteinIL1RL1 protein, humanInterleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 Proteinatherosclerosiscoronary artery calcium scorehigh sensitive C-reactive proteinSoluble ST2

Identifiers

PMID27593861
PMCPMC5011265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.