Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27593687›Full record

ReviewCurrent drug targets2017

Antibody Based Therapies in Acute Leukemia.

Nirali N Shah

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current drug targets, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The crystal structure of DynF from the dynemicin-biosynthesis pathway of Micromonospora chersina.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nirali N ShahPediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 1W-3750, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892-1104, 301-496-4256 Facsimile 301-451-7010, United States.
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite great progress in the curative treatment of acute leukemia, outcomes for those with relapsed and/or chemotherapy-refractory disease remain poor. Current intensive cytotoxic therapies can be associated with significant morbidity and novel therapies are needed to improve outcomes. Immunotherapy based approaches provide an alternative mechanism of action in the treatment of acute leukemia. Due to cell surface antigen expression, leukemia in particular is amenable to targeted therapies, such as antibody-based therapy. Based on the potential for non-overlapping toxicity, the possibility of synergistic action with standard chemotherapy, and by providing a novel method to overcome chemotherapy resistance, antibody-based therapies have shown potential for benefit. Modifications to standard monoclonal antibodies, including drug conjugation and linkage to T-cells, may further enhance efficacy of antibody-based therapies. Identifying the ideal timing for incorporation of antibody-based therapies, within standard regimens, may lead to improvement in overall outcomes. This article will provide an overview of antibody-based therapies in clinical development for the treatment of acute leukemia in children and adults, with a particular focus on the current strategies and future developments.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsChildClinical Trials as TopicDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug SynergismHumansImmunotherapyLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMolecular Targeted TherapyTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsAcute leukemiaantibody therapyblinatumomabgemtuzumabinotuzumabrituximab.

Identifiers

PMID27593687
PMCPMC8335750
OpenAlexW2513508089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.