Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27593464›Full record

ArticlePlant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology2016

Modelling water use efficiency in a dynamic environment: An example using Arabidopsis thaliana.

S Vialet-Chabrand, J S A Matthews, O Brendel, M R Blatt, Y Wang, A Hills, H Griffiths, S Rogers, T Lawson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Rapid ChlorophyllPlant physiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Role of blue and red light in stomatal dynamic behaviour.Journal of experimental botany · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. A generalised dynamic model of leaf-level CPhotosynthesis research · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

S Vialet-ChabrandSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK.
J S A MatthewsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK.
O BrendelEEF, INRA, Université de Lorraine, F-54280 Champenoux, France.
M R BlattLaboratory of Plant Physiology and Biophysics, University of Glasgow, Bower Building, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Y WangLaboratory of Plant Physiology and Biophysics, University of Glasgow, Bower Building, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
A HillsLaboratory of Plant Physiology and Biophysics, University of Glasgow, Bower Building, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
H GriffithsPlant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK.
S RogersComputing Science, University of Glasgow, Alwyn Williams Building, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
T LawsonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK. Electronic address: tlawson@essex.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F001673/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsic water use efficiency (Wi), the ratio of net CO2 assimilation (A) over stomatal conductance to water vapour (gs), is a complex trait used to assess plant performance. Improving Wi could lead in theory to higher productivity or reduced water usage by the plant, but the physiological traits for improvement and their combined effects on Wi have not been clearly identified. Under fluctuating light intensity, the temporal response of gs is an order of magnitude slower than A, which results in rapid variations in Wi. Compared to traditional approaches, our new model scales stoma behaviour at the leaf level to predict gs and A during a diurnal period, reproducing natural fluctuations of light intensity, in order to dissect Wi into traits of interest. The results confirmed the importance of stomatal density and photosynthetic capacity on Wi but also revealed the importance of incomplete stomatal closure under dark conditions as well as stomatal sensitivity to light intensity. The observed continuous decrease of A and gs over the diurnal period was successfully described by negative feedback of the accumulation of photosynthetic products. Investigation into the impact of leaf anatomy on temporal responses of A, gs and Wi revealed that a high density of stomata produces the most rapid response of gs but may result in lower Wi.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisBayes TheoremCarbon DioxideCircadian RhythmConservation of Natural ResourcesModels, TheoreticalPlant StomataPlant TranspirationWaterCarbon DioxideWaterDiurnalDynamicsIntrinsic water use efficiencyPhotosynthesisStomatal conductance

Identifiers

PMID27593464
PMCPMC5038844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.