Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27593180›Full record

ArticleNeuron2016

Purkinje Cells Directly Inhibit Granule Cells in Specialized Regions of the Cerebellar Cortex.

Chong Guo, Laurens Witter, Stephanie Rudolph, Hunter L Elliott, Katelin A Ennis, Wade G Regehr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Purkinje Cell Collaterals Preferentially Target a Subtype of Molecular Layer Interneuron.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Purkinje cell models: past, present and future.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The Cerebellar Cortex.Annual review of neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chong GuoDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Laurens WitterDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Stephanie RudolphDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Hunter L ElliottImage and Data Analysis Core, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Katelin A EnnisDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Wade G RegehrDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: wade_regehr@hms.harvard.edu.

Funding

Super-Resolution ImagingP30NS072030 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI REGEHR, WADE G · 2011 to 2020
$5.8M
Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity in the CNSR01NS032405 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI REGEHR, WADE G · 1995 to 2016
$4.8M
Regulation of Synchrony and Input Layer Excitability by Purkinje Cell CollateralsR01NS092707 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI REGEHR, WADE G · 2015 to 2016
$647k
Dynamic control of sensory processing by an active network of interneuronsF32NS087708 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI RUDOLPH, STEPHANIE · 2014 to 2017
$175k
NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS087708NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS072030NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS032405NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibition of granule cells plays a key role in gating the flow of signals into the cerebellum, and it is thought that Golgi cells are the only interneurons that inhibit granule cells. Here we show that Purkinje cells, the sole output neurons of the cerebellar cortex, also directly inhibit granule cells via their axon collaterals. Anatomical and optogenetic studies indicate that this non-canonical feedback is region specific: it is most prominent in lobules that regulate eye movement and process vestibular information. Collaterals provide fast, slow, and tonic inhibition to granule cells, and thus allow Purkinje cells to regulate granule cell excitability on multiple timescales. We propose that this feedback mechanism could regulate excitability of the input layer, contribute to sparse coding, and mediate temporal integration.

Indexed as

Neural InhibitionAnimalsCerebellar Cortexgamma-Aminobutyric AcidMiceNeuronsPurkinje CellsSynapsesgamma-Aminobutyric Acid

Identifiers

PMID27593180
PMCPMC5853127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.