Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27593166›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2016

A Part-Of-Speech term weighting scheme for biomedical information retrieval.

Yanshan Wang, Stephen Wu, Dingcheng Li, Saeed Mehrabi, Hongfang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical Information Retrieval: A Literature Review.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yanshan WangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: wang.yanshan@mayo.edu.
Stephen WuDepartment of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. Electronic address: wst@ohsu.edu.
Dingcheng LiDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: li.dingcheng@mayo.edu.
Saeed MehrabiDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: mehrabi.saeed@mayo.edu.
Hongfang LiuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: liu.hongfang@mayo.edu.

Funding

Semi-structured Information Retrieval in Clinical Text for Cohort IdentificationR01LM011934 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI HERSH, WILLIAM R, LIU, HONGFANG · 2014 to 2025
$5.1M
Secondary use of EMRs for surgical complication surveillanceR01EB019403 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LIU, HONGFANG, STORLIE, CURTIS · 2015 to 2022
$3.8M
Natural language processing for clinical and translational researchR01GM102282 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LIU, HONGFANG, PAKHOMOV, SERGUEI VS · 2013 to 2016
$2.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019403NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102282NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of digitalization, information retrieval (IR), which retrieves and ranks documents from large collections according to users' search queries, has been popularly applied in the biomedical domain. Building patient cohorts using electronic health records (EHRs) and searching literature for topics of interest are some IR use cases. Meanwhile, natural language processing (NLP), such as tokenization or Part-Of-Speech (POS) tagging, has been developed for processing clinical documents or biomedical literature. We hypothesize that NLP can be incorporated into IR to strengthen the conventional IR models. In this study, we propose two NLP-empowered IR models, POS-BoW and POS-MRF, which incorporate automatic POS-based term weighting schemes into bag-of-word (BoW) and Markov Random Field (MRF) IR models, respectively. In the proposed models, the POS-based term weights are iteratively calculated by utilizing a cyclic coordinate method where golden section line search algorithm is applied along each coordinate to optimize the objective function defined by mean average precision (MAP). In the empirical experiments, we used the data sets from the Medical Records track in Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) 2011 and 2012 and the Genomics track in TREC 2004. The evaluation on TREC 2011 and 2012 Medical Records tracks shows that, for the POS-BoW models, the mean improvement rates for IR evaluation metrics, MAP, bpref, and P@10, are 10.88%, 4.54%, and 3.82%, compared to the BoW models; and for the POS-MRF models, these rates are 13.59%, 8.20%, and 8.78%, compared to the MRF models. Additionally, we experimentally verify that the proposed weighting approach is superior to the simple heuristic and frequency based weighting approaches, and validate our POS category selection. Using the optimal weights calculated in this experiment, we tested the proposed models on the TREC 2004 Genomics track and obtained average of 8.63% and 10.04% improvement rates for POS-BoW and POS-MRF, respectively. These significant improvements verify the effectiveness of leveraging POS tagging for biomedical IR tasks.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsInformation Storage and RetrievalNatural Language ProcessingAlgorithmsHumansLinguisticsBag-of-wordBiomedical information retrievalMarkov random fieldNatural language processingPart-Of-Speech

Identifiers

PMID27593166
PMCPMC5493484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.