ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2016
INDEED: Integrated differential expression and differential network analysis of omic data for biomarker discovery.
Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- BDDN: bayesian dynamic differential network analysis in cancer proteomics.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- BIM-Ken: Identifying Disease-Related miRNA Biomarkers Based on Knowledge-Enhanced Bio-Network.Genes · 2025Article
- Identification of novel key regulatory lncRNAs in gastric adenocarcinoma.BMC genomics · 2022Review
- Data analysis methods for defining biomarkers from omics data.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022Review
- Approaches to Integrating Metabolomics and Multi-Omics Data: A Primer.Metabolites · 2021Review
- The metaRbolomics Toolbox in Bioconductor and beyond.Metabolites · 2019Review
- Differential gene expression analysis reveals novel genes and pathways in pediatric septic shock patients.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- MOTA: Multi-omic integrative analysis for biomarker discovery.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2019Article
- Integrating gene regulatory pathways into differential network analysis of gene expression data.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Network Medicine in the Age of Biomedical Big Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- INDEED: R package for network based differential expression analysis.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2018Article
- CancerDiscover: an integrative pipeline for cancer biomarker and cancer class prediction from high-throughput sequencing data.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Identification of potential tissue-specific cancer biomarkers and development of cancer versus normal genomic classifiers.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Green Chemistry Preservation and Extraction of Biospecimens for Multi-omic Analyses.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Differential expression (DE) analysis is commonly used to identify biomarker candidates that have significant changes in their expression levels between distinct biological groups. One drawback of DE analysis is that it only considers the changes on single biomolecule level. Recently, differential network (DN) analysis has become popular due to its capability to measure the changes on biomolecular pair level. In DN analysis, network is typically built based on correlation and biomarker candidates are selected by investigating the network topology. However, correlation tends to generate over-complicated networks and the selection of biomarker candidates purely based on network topology ignores the changes on single biomolecule level. In this paper, we propose a novel approach, INDEED, that builds sparse differential network based on partial correlation and integrates DE and DN analyses for biomarker discovery. We applied this approach on real proteomic and glycomic data generated by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) biomarker discovery study. For each omic data, we used one dataset to select biomarker candidates, built a disease classifier and evaluated the performance of the classifier on an independent dataset. The biomarker candidates, selected by INDEED, were more reproducible across independent datasets, and led to a higher classification accuracy in predicting HCC cases and cirrhotic controls compared with those selected by separate DE and DN analyses. INDEED also identified some candidates previously reported to be relevant to HCC, such as intercellular adhesion molecule 2 (ICAM2) and c4b-binding protein alpha chain (C4BPA), which were missed by both DE and DN analyses. In addition, we applied INDEED for survival time prediction based on transcriptomic data acquired by analysis of samples from breast cancer patients. We selected biomarker candidates and built a regression model for survival time prediction based on a gene expression dataset and patients' survival records. We evaluated the performance of the regression model on an independent dataset. Compared with the biomarker candidates selected by DE and DN analyses, those selected through INDEED led to more accurate survival time prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.