Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27592383›Full record

ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2016

INDEED: Integrated differential expression and differential network analysis of omic data for biomarker discovery.

Yiming Zuo, Yi Cui, Cristina Di Poto, Rency S Varghese, Guoqiang Yu, Ruijiang Li, Habtom W Ressom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Data analysis methods for defining biomarkers from omics data.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. MOTA: Multi-omic integrative analysis for biomarker discovery.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. INDEED: R package for network based differential expression analysis.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yiming ZuoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Arlington, VA 22203, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA. Electronic address: zyiming@vt.edu.
Yi CuiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. Electronic address: cuiyi@stanford.edu.
Cristina Di PotoLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA. Electronic address: cd329@georgetown.edu.
Rency S VargheseLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA. Electronic address: rsv4@georgetown.edu.
Guoqiang YuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Arlington, VA 22203, USA. Electronic address: yug@vt.edu.
Ruijiang LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. Electronic address: rli2@stanford.edu.
Habtom W RessomLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA. Electronic address: hwr@georgetown.edu.

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Analysis of Racial Disparities in HCC by Systems MetabolomicsU01CA185188 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI RESSOM, HABTOM W · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Analysis of LC-MS data to identify peptide and glycan biomarkers for hepatocellulR01CA143420 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI RESSOM, HABTOM W · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
Quantitative analysis of LC-MS data for peptide and glycan biomarker discoveryR01GM086746 · NIGMS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI RESSOM, HABTOM W · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS R01 CA143420NCI NIH HHS U01 CA185188NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differential expression (DE) analysis is commonly used to identify biomarker candidates that have significant changes in their expression levels between distinct biological groups. One drawback of DE analysis is that it only considers the changes on single biomolecule level. Recently, differential network (DN) analysis has become popular due to its capability to measure the changes on biomolecular pair level. In DN analysis, network is typically built based on correlation and biomarker candidates are selected by investigating the network topology. However, correlation tends to generate over-complicated networks and the selection of biomarker candidates purely based on network topology ignores the changes on single biomolecule level. In this paper, we propose a novel approach, INDEED, that builds sparse differential network based on partial correlation and integrates DE and DN analyses for biomarker discovery. We applied this approach on real proteomic and glycomic data generated by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) biomarker discovery study. For each omic data, we used one dataset to select biomarker candidates, built a disease classifier and evaluated the performance of the classifier on an independent dataset. The biomarker candidates, selected by INDEED, were more reproducible across independent datasets, and led to a higher classification accuracy in predicting HCC cases and cirrhotic controls compared with those selected by separate DE and DN analyses. INDEED also identified some candidates previously reported to be relevant to HCC, such as intercellular adhesion molecule 2 (ICAM2) and c4b-binding protein alpha chain (C4BPA), which were missed by both DE and DN analyses. In addition, we applied INDEED for survival time prediction based on transcriptomic data acquired by analysis of samples from breast cancer patients. We selected biomarker candidates and built a regression model for survival time prediction based on a gene expression dataset and patients' survival records. We evaluated the performance of the regression model on an independent dataset. Compared with the biomarker candidates selected by DE and DN analyses, those selected through INDEED led to more accurate survival time prediction.

Indexed as

Antigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell Adhesion MoleculesChromatography, LiquidComplement C4b-Binding ProteinGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlycomicsHumansLiver NeoplasmsMass SpectrometryProteomicsTranscriptomeAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorC4BPA protein, humanCell Adhesion MoleculesComplement C4b-Binding ProteinICAM2 protein, humanDifferential expression analysisDifferential network analysisGlycomicsProteomicsTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID27592383
PMCPMC5135617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.