ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2017
Evaluation of anticoagulation selection for acute venous thromboembolism.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The anticoagulant effects of milvexian, a novel small molecule factor XIa inhibitor, are neutralized by activated prothrombin complex concentrates and recombinant factor VIIa in human plasma and whole bloodResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- Suspected Rivaroxaban-Induced Anaphylaxis Secondary to Ingestion of Rivaroxaban and Nimesulide Without Cross-Reactivity to Dabigatran - A Case Report.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2023Article
- Practice patterns surrounding referral to a specialty venous thromboembolism (VTE) clinic: a retrospective review.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2022Article
- A Case Report of Rivaroxaban-Induced Urticaria and Angioedema With Possible Cross-Reaction to Dabigatran.Journal of medical cases · 2019Article
- Hospital length of stay in patients initiated on direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for venous thromboembolism: a real-world single-center study.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2018Article
- Initiation of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for venous thromboembolism: impact on time to hospital discharge.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2018Observational
- Temporal trends in initiation of VKA, rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran for the treatment of venous thromboembolism - A Danish nationwide cohort study.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been confined to parenteral agents and oral vitamin K antagonists for decades; however, with the approval of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), clinicians now have more options. This study aims to evaluate the real world prescribing practices of all oral anticoagulants for VTE at a single center. A retrospective cohort analysis of all adult patients diagnosed with acute onset VTE was conducted. Of the 105 patients included in the analysis, 45 (43 %) patients received warfarin and 60 (57 %) patients received a DOAC. Rivaroxaban and apixaban were the most common DOACs initiated. There were significantly more patients in the warfarin group with an eCrCl of <60 ml/min compared to patients who received a DOAC (77.8 % vs. 15 %; P < 0.05). There were significantly less patients in the warfarin group with serum aminotranferase concentrations three times the upper limit of normal compared to those who received a DOAC (15.6 % vs. 55 %; P < 0.05). Patients who received a DOAC had less days on parenteral anticoagulation compared to patients who received warfarin (median 2.5 days [IQR 0-4] vs. 6 days [IQR 5-7], p < 0.05). Patients who received a DOAC had a shorter hospital length of stay compared to patients who received warfarin (median 3 days [IQR 2-4] vs. 8 days [IQR 6-10], p < 0.05). This analysis showed that DOACs are being prescribed more than warfarin for treatment of new onset VTE. Renal and liver function may influence the agent prescribed. Utilization of DOACs may decrease the hospital length of stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27592341What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.