ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2017
Contribution of extrafibrillar matrix to the mechanical behavior of bone using a novel cohesive finite element model.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Regularization on Efficient Modeling and Simulation of Bioinspired Composites Using Cohesive Zone Method.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- In-silico simulation of nanoindentation on bone using a 2D cohesive finite element model.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2024Article
- Elucidating the role of diverse mineralisation paradigms on bone biomechanics - a coarse-grained molecular dynamics investigation.Nanoscale · 2024Article
- Computational modeling and simulation of epithelial wound closure.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Retrospective Evaluation and Framework Development of Bone Anisotropic Material Behavior Compared with Elastic, Elastic-Plastic, and Hyper-Elastic Properties.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Poor bone matrix quality: What can be done about it?Current osteoporosis reports · 2021Review
- A computational study of mechanical properties of collagen-based bio-composites.International biomechanics · 2020Article
- Advanced Modeling Methods-Applications to Bone Fracture Mechanics.Current osteoporosis reports · 2020Review
- Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- AGE-RELATED DETERIORATION OF BONE TOUGHNESS IS RELATED TO DIMINISHING AMOUNT OF MATRIX GLYCOSAMINOGLYCANS (GAGS).JBMR plus · 2018Article
- Numerical investigation of the role of intercellular interactions on collective epithelial cell migration.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2018Article
- Computational Modeling of Interfacial Behaviors in Nanocomposite Materials.International journal of solids and structures · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanical behavior of bone is determined at all hierarchical levels, including lamellae (the basic building block of bone) that are comprised of mineralized collagen fibrils and extrafibrillar matrix. The mechanical behavior of mineralized collagen fibrils has been investigated intensively using both experimental and computational approaches. Yet, the contribution of the extrafibrillar matrix to bone mechanical properties is poorly documented. In this study, we intended to address this issue using a novel cohesive finite element (FE) model, in conjunction with the experimental observations reported in the literature. In the FE model, the extrafibrillar matrix was considered as a nanocomposite of hydroxyapatite (HA) crystals bounded through a thin organic interface modeled as a cohesive interfacial zone. The parameters required by the cohesive FE model were defined based on the experimental data reported in the literature. This hybrid nanocomposite model was tested in two loading modes (i.e. tension and compression) and under two hydration conditions (i.e. wet and dry). The simulation results indicated that (1) the failure modes of the extrafibrillar matrix predicted using the cohesive FE model were closely coincided with those experimentally observed in tension and compression tests; (2) the pre-yield deformation (i.e. internal strain) of HA crystals with respect to the applied strain was consistent with that obtained from the synchrotron X-ray scattering measurements irrespective of the loading modes and hydration status; and (3) the mechanical behavior of the extrafibrillar matrix was dictated by the properties of the organic interface between the HA crystals. Taken together, we postulate that the extrafibrillar matrix plays a major role in the pre-yield deformation and the failure mode of bone, thus, giving rise to important insights in the ultrastructural origins of bone fragility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.