ArticleContemporary clinical trials2017
Sequential designs for individualized dosing in phase I cancer clinical trials.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of Exercise as Interception Therapy for Cancer: A Review.JAMA oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper addresses dose finding in clinical trials where individuals exhibit biologic characteristics that alter the toxicity risks of the individuals. In these situations, instead of determining a dose that works for every patient, the trial aims to identify a dosing algorithm that prescribes dose according to the patient's biomarker or pharmacokinetic expression. Specifically, we aim to dose patients around a pre-specified level of area under the curve of irinotecan concentration using the patients' baseline phenotypes that predict drug clearance. We propose least squares recursion procedures to estimate the dosing algorithm sequentially with an aim to treat patients in the trial around the true unknown dosing algorithm, and introduce a novel application of an eigenvalue theory that guarantees convergence to the true dosing algorithms. Our simulation study demonstrates that using an eigenvalue constraint improves the efficiency of the recursion by as large as 40%, while concentrating in-trial patient allocation around the true dosing algorithm. We also provide practical guidance on design calibration, and design future irinotecan studies based on data from our first trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.