Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27591930›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical education2016

Can blended learning and the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction in Saudi Arabia?

Muhammad R Sajid, Abrar F Laheji, Fayha Abothenain, Yezan Salam, Dina AlJayar, Akef Obeidat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad R SajidDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abrar F LahejiCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fayha AbothenainCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yezan SalamCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Dina AlJayarCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Akef ObeidatDepartment of Medical Education, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate student academic performance and perception towards blended learning and flipped classrooms in comparison to traditional teaching.

methodsThis study was conducted during the hematology block on year three students. Five lectures were delivered online only. Asynchronous discussion boards were created where students could interact with colleagues and instructors. A flipped classroom was introduced with application exercises. Summative assessment results were compared with previous year results as a historical control for statistical significance. Student feedback regarding their blended learning experience was collected.

resultsA total of 127 responses were obtained. Approximately 22.8% students felt all lectures should be delivered through didactic lecturing, while almost 35% felt that 20% of total lectures should be given online. Students expressed satisfaction with blended learning as a new and effective learning approach. The majority of students reported blended learning was helpful for exam preparation and concept clarification. However, a comparison of grades did not show a statistically significant increase in the academic performance of students taught via the blended learning method.

conclusionsLearning experiences can be enriched by adopting a blended method of instruction at various stages of undergraduate and postgraduate education. Our results suggest that blended learning, a relatively new concept in Saudi Arabia, shows promising results with higher student satisfaction. Flipped classrooms replace passive lecturing with active student-centered learning that enhances critical thinking and application, including information retention.

Indexed as

LearningPersonal SatisfactionAdultComputer-Assisted InstructionCurriculumEducational MeasurementFeedbackFemaleHumansMaleProblem-Based LearningSaudi ArabiaStudents, Medicalasynchronous discussion boardsblended learningflipped classroomonline learning

Identifiers

PMID27591930
PMCPMC5018351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.