Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27591918›Full record

Trial reportBehaviour research and therapy2016

Randomized controlled trial of attention bias modification in a racially diverse, socially anxious, alcohol dependent sample.

Elise M Clerkin, Joshua C Magee, Tony T Wells, Courtney Beard, Nancy P Barnett

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behaviour research and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Effects of attention bias modification for anxiety: Neurophysiological indices and moderation by symptom severity.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elise M ClerkinDepartment of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA. Electronic address: clerkiem@miamioh.edu.
Joshua C MageeDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Tony T WellsDepartment of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Courtney BeardDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School and McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA.
Nancy P BarnettDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

CBM: A Novel Intervention for Alcohol Dependence and Social AnxietyR21AA021151 · NIAAA · MIAMI UNIVERSITY OXFORD · PI CLERKIN, ELISE MARIE · 2013 to 2014
$368k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA021151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAttention biases may be an important treatment target for both alcohol dependence and social anxiety. This is the first ABM trial to investigate two (vs. one) targets of attention bias within a sample with co-occurring symptoms of social anxiety and alcohol dependence. Additionally, we used trial-level bias scores (TL-BS) to capture the phenomena of attention bias in a more ecologically valid, dynamic way compared to traditional attention bias scores.

methodAdult participants (N = 86; 41% Female; 52% African American; 40% White) with elevated social anxiety symptoms and alcohol dependence were randomly assigned to an 8-session training condition in this 2 (Social Anxiety ABM vs. Social Anxiety Control) by 2 (Alcohol ABM vs. Alcohol Control) design. Symptoms of social anxiety, alcohol dependence, and attention bias were assessed across time.

resultsMultilevel models estimated the trajectories for each measure within individuals, and tested whether these trajectories differed according to the randomized training conditions. Across time, there were significant or trending decreases in all attention TL-BS parameters (but not traditional attention bias scores) and most symptom measures. However, there were not significant differences in the trajectories of change between any ABM and control conditions for any symptom measures.

conclusionsThese findings add to previous evidence questioning the robustness of ABM and point to the need to extend the effects of ABM to samples that are racially diverse and/or have co-occurring psychopathology. The results also illustrate the potential importance of calculating trial-level attention bias scores rather than only including traditional bias scores.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasTeachingAdultAlcoholismFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhobia, SocialRacial GroupsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAlcohol dependenceAttention bias modificationSocial anxiety

Identifiers

PMID27591918
PMCPMC5127758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.