Trial reportJournal of cardiovascular computed tomography
Prospective evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction on the reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in reduced radiation dose 320 detector row CT.
Trial report in Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01621594 (Prospective Evaluation of New Techniques in Radiation Reduction for Cardiovascular Computed Tomographic Angiography), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Evaluation of New Techniques in Radiation Reduction for Cardiovascular Computed Tomographic Angiography
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-Dose Scanning Technology Combined with Low-Concentration Contrast Material in Renal Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA): A Preliminary Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017Trial
- Development of a computed tomography calcium scoring technique for assessing calcinosis distribution, pattern and burden in dermatomyositis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Low-dose, high-pitch, spiral (FLASH) mode versus conventional sequential method for coronary artery calcium scoring: A derivation-validation study.Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2024Article
- Computed Tomography-Based Coronary Artery Calcium Score Calculation at a Reduced Tube Voltage Utilizing Iterative Reconstruction and Threshold Modification Techniques: A Feasibility Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Coronary Artery Calcium Data and Reporting System (CAC-DRS): A Primer.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Review
- Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomographic Coronary Artery Calcium Evaluation With a 64-Slice Scanner Versus a 256-Slice Scanner.Texas Heart Institute journal · 2022Article
- Association of individual aortic leaflet calcification on paravalvular regurgitation and conduction abnormalities with self-expanding trans-catheter aortic valve insertion.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- The sub-millisievert era in CTCA: the technical basis of the new radiation dose approach.La Radiologia medica · 2020Review
- Using radiation safely in cardiology: what imagers need to know.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2019Article
- Accuracy of coronary artery calcium scoring with tube current reduction by 75%, using an adaptive iterative reconstruction algorithm.The British journal of radiology · 2018Article
- Breast arterial calcification association with coronary artery calcium scoring and implications for cardiovascular risk assessment in women.Clinical cardiology · 2017Review
- Recent advances in cardiac computed tomography dose reduction strategies: a review of scientific evidence and technical developments.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2017Review
- Multimodality Imaging in Aortic Stenosis.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart AssociationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCoronary artery calcium (CAC) predicts coronary heart disease events and is important for individualized cardiac risk assessment. This report assesses the interscan variability of CT for coronary calcium quantification using image acquisition with standard and reduced radiation dose protocols and whether the use of reduced radiation dose acquisition with iterative reconstruction (IR; "reduced-dose/IR ") allows for similar image quality and reproducibility when compared to standard radiation dose acquisition with filtered back projection (FBP; "standard-dose/FBP") on 320-detector row computed tomography (320-CT).
methods200 consecutive patients (60 ± 9 years, 59% male) prospectively underwent two standard- and two reduced-dose acquisitions (800 total scans, 1600 reconstructions) using 320 slice CT and 120 kV tube voltage. Automated tube current modulation was used and for reduced-dose scans, prescribed tube current was lowered by 70%. Image noise and Agatston scores were determined and compared.
resultsRegarding stratification by Agatston score categories (0, 1-10, 11-100, 101-400, >400), reduced-dose/IR versus standard-dose/FBP had excellent agreement at 89% (95% CI: 86-92%) with kappa 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81-0.90). Standard-dose/FBP rescan agreement was 93% (95% CI: 89-96%) with kappa = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.95) while reduced-dose/IR rescan agreement was similar at 91% (95% CI: 87-94%) with kappa 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83-0.93). Image noise was significantly higher but clinically acceptable for reduced-dose/IR (18 Hounsfield Unit [HU] mean) compared to standard-dose/FBP (16 HU; p < 0.0001). Median radiation exposure was 74% lower for reduced- (0.37 mSv) versus standard-dose (1.4 mSv) acquisitions.
conclusionRescan agreement was excellent for reduced-dose image acquisition with iterative reconstruction and standard-dose acquisition with filtered back projection for the quantification of coronary calcium by CT. These methods make it possible to reduce radiation exposure by 74%. CLINICAL
trial registrationURL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01621594. UNIQUE IDENTIFIER: NCT01621594.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.