Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27591145›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2016

From Nose to Brain: Un-Sensed Electrical Currents Applied in the Nose Alter Activity in Deep Brain Structures.

Tali Weiss, Sagit Shushan, Aharon Ravia, Avital Hahamy, Lavi Secundo, Aharon Weissbrod, Aya Ben-Yakov, Yael Holtzman, Smadar Cohen-Atsmoni, Yehudah Roth and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Past, Present, and Future of Human Chemical Communication Research.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Olfactory Function and Olfactory Disorders.Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tali WeissDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Sagit ShushanDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Aharon RaviaDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Avital HahamyDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Lavi SecundoDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Aharon WeissbrodDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Aya Ben-YakovDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Yael HoltzmanDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Smadar Cohen-AtsmoniDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon 58100, Israel.
Yehudah RothDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon 58100, Israel.
Noam SobelDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Weizmann Institute of Science · ILWolfson Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rules linking patterns of olfactory receptor neuron activation in the nose to activity patterns in the brain and ensuing odor perception remain poorly understood. Artificially stimulating olfactory neurons with electrical currents and measuring ensuing perception may uncover these rules. We therefore inserted an electrode into the nose of 50 human volunteers and applied various currents for about an hour in each case. This induced assorted non-olfactory sensations but never once the perception of odor. To validate contact with the olfactory path, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure resting-state brain activity in 18 subjects before and after un-sensed stimulation. We observed stimulation-induced neural decorrelation specifically in primary olfactory cortex, implying contact with the olfactory path. These results suggest that indiscriminate olfactory activation does not equate with odor perception. Moreover, this effort serendipitously uncovered a novel path for minimally invasive brain stimulation through the nose.

Indexed as

brain stimulationdefault-mode networkolfactory cortexolfactory epitheliumolfactory perceptionresting-state activity

Identifiers

PMID27591145
PMCPMC5066827
OpenAlexW2514906437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.