Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27591024›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

Influence of habitual dietary fibre intake on the responsiveness of the gut microbiota to a prebiotic: protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, single-centre study.

Genelle Healey, Louise Brough, Chrissie Butts, Rinki Murphy, Kevin Whelan, Jane Coad

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Genelle HealeyMassey Institute of Food Science and Technology, School of Food and Nutrition, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand Department of Food, Nutrition and Health, Plant and Food Research Limited, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Louise BroughMassey Institute of Food Science and Technology, School of Food and Nutrition, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Chrissie ButtsDepartment of Food, Nutrition and Health, Plant and Food Research Limited, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Rinki MurphyFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Kevin WhelanFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College, London, UK.
Jane CoadMassey Institute of Food Science and Technology, School of Food and Nutrition, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe commensal gut microbiota have been shown to have an impact on human health as aberrant gut microbiota have been linked to disease. Dietary constituents are influential in shaping the gut microbiota. Diet-specific therapeutic strategies may therefore play a role in optimising human health via beneficial manipulation of the gut microbiota. Research has suggested that an individual's baseline gut microbiota composition may influence how the gut microbiota respond to a dietary intervention and individuals with differing habitual dietary intakes appear to have distinct baseline gut microbiota compositions. The responsiveness of the gut microbiota may therefore be influenced by habitual dietary intakes. This study aims to investigate what influence differing habitual dietary fibre intakes have on the responsiveness of the gut microbiota to a prebiotic intervention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, single-centre study, 20 low dietary fibre (dietary fibre intake <18 g/day for females and <22 g/day for males) and 20 high dietary fibre (dietary fibre intake ≥25 g/day for females and ≥30 g/day for males) consumers will be recruited. Participants will be randomised to a placebo (Glucidex 29 Premium) or a prebiotic (Synergy 1) intervention for 3 weeks with a 3-week washout followed by 3 weeks of the alternative intervention. Outcome measures of gut microbiota composition (using 16S rRNA gene sequencing) and functional capacity (faecal short chain fatty acid concentrations and Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt)) as well as appetite (visual analogue scale appetite questionnaire) will be assessed at the beginning and end of each intervention phase. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Massey University Human Ethics Committee approved this study (Massey University HEC: Southern A application-15/34). Results will be disseminated through peer-review journal publications, conference presentations and a summary of findings will be distributed to participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615000922572; Pre-results.

Indexed as

DietFeeding BehaviorPrebioticsAdultAgedAppetiteDietary FiberFatty Acids, VolatileFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractHumansMaleMiddle AgedResearch DesignRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDietary FiberFatty Acids, VolatilePrebioticsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene sequencingAppetiteGut microbiotaNUTRITION & DIETETICSPrebiotic

Identifiers

PMID27591024
PMCPMC5020659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.