SynthesisBMJ open2016
Is self-monitoring of blood glucose effective in improving glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes without insulin treatment: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Efficacy and Frequency of Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose in Non-insulin-Treated T2D Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Pooled it
- The impact of structured self-monitoring of blood glucose on clinical, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes among adults with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of the chronic care model for adults with type 2 diabetes in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Glycemic control among diabetic patients in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Effects of Structured Versus Unstructured Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose on Glucose Control in Patients With Non-insulin-treated Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2018Pooled it
- Electronic blood glucose monitoring impacts on provider and patient behavior.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Effect of structured self-monitoring of blood glucose, with and without additional TeleCare support, on overall glycaemic control in non-insulin treated Type 2 diabetes: the SMBG Study, a 12-month randomized controlled trial.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2019Trial
- Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the TODAY Study.Diabetes care · 2019 · on this mapTrial
- Laser-Assisted Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: Analytical Performance, Clinical Accuracy, and Usability of the HandyRay-Glu System.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Willingness to Pay for Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring in People With Prehypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Tri-Language Questionnaire for Usability and Satisfaction of Mobile Health Applications (USHA) for Diabetes Mellitus Management.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Impact of national reimbursement policy supporting test strips on glycemic control in people with insulin-treated diabetes: retrospective cohort study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Effects of an Electronic Medical Records-Linked Diabetes Self-Management System on Treatment Targets in Real Clinical Practice: Retrospective, Observational Cohort Study.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2024Observational
- Blood glucose monitoring devices: current considerations.Australian prescriber · 2023Review
- Risk reduction intervention for raised blood pressure (REVERSE): protocol for a mixed-methods feasibility study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Gender and Ethnic Differences in Diabetes Self Care in Malaysia: An Individual Participant Meta-Analysis of Summary of Diabetes Self Care Activities Studies.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2023Article
- Real-world Benefits of Diabetes Management App Use and Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose on Glycemic Control: Retrospective Analyses.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2022Article
- Perceived value of self-monitoring blood glucose by primary care physicians and endocrinologists.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe present study aimed to verify the effectiveness of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D).
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ScienceDirect and ClinicalTrials.gov from their respective inception dates to 26 October 2015. Eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included according to prespecified criteria. The quality of the included RCTs was evaluated according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the evidence quality of meta-analyses was assessed by the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. A meta-analysis of primary and secondary outcome measures was performed. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were carried out to evaluate the robustness and heterogeneity of the findings. Begg's and Egger's tests were used to quantify publication biases.
resultsA total of 15 RCTs, comprising 3383 patients with non-insulin-treated T2D, met the inclusion criteria. The SMBG intervention improved glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (mean difference -0.33; 95% CI -0.45 to -0.22; p=3.0730e-8; n=18), body mass index (BMI; -0.65; -1.18 to -0.12; p=0.0164; n=9) and total cholesterol (TC; -0.12; -0.20 to -0.04; p=0.0034; n=8) more effectively than the control in overall effect. The sensitivity analysis revealed little difference in overall effect, indicating the robustness of the results. SMBG moderated HbA1c levels better than the control in all subgroup analyses. Most of the RCTs had high risk of bias in blinding, while the overall quality of evidence for HbA1c was moderate according to the GRADE criteria. Publication bias was moderate for BMI.
conclusionsSMBG improved HbA1c levels in the short term (≤6-month follow-up) and long term (≥12-month follow-up) in patients with T2D who were not using insulin. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015019099.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.