Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27590995›Full record

Observational studyGut2017

Discrepancies between patient-reported outcomes, and endoscopic and histological appearance in UC.

Jean-Frédéric Colombel, Mary E Keir, Alexis Scherl, Rui Zhao, Gert de Hertogh, William A Faubion, Timothy T Lu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Gut, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04990245 (APOLLO Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 79 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04990245 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

APOLLO Study: pAtient rePorted Outcomes Linked With histoLogy in Patients With uLcerative cOlitis

TypeobservationalSponsorImelda GI Clinical Research CenterRan2020 to 2021Enrolled86ConditionsUlcerative ColitisArmsendoscopic biopsies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A Treat-to-Target Update in Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Functional Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Expert Review.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2019
    Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jean-Frédéric ColombelDivision of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Mary E KeirGenentech Research and Early Development, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Alexis ScherlGenentech Research and Early Development, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Rui ZhaoGenentech Research and Early Development, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Gert de HertoghDepartment of Morphology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
William A FaubionDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Timothy T LuGenentech Research and Early Development, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBoth endoscopy and histology may be included in the definition of mucosal healing in UC. This study aimed to establish the association between patient-reported outcomes, specifically symptom measures, and the presence of inflammation as measured by endoscopy and histology in UC.

designUsing patient data from an observational multicentre study of UC (n=103), rectal bleeding (RB) and stool frequency (SF) symptom subscores of the Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) were compared with the endoscopic subscore (MCSe) and histology. Faecal calprotectin and biopsy cytokine expression were also evaluated.

resultsWhen identifying UC patients with inactive disease, RB scores were superior to SF scores and the combination (sensitivity/specificity: MCSe=0/1, RB 77%/81%, SF 62%/95%, RB+SF 54%/95%; MCSe=0, RB 87%/66%, SF 76%/83%, RB+SF 68%/86%). Across different definitions of mucosal healing (MCSe≤1; 0; or 0 plus inactive histology), a larger subset of patients reported increased SF (39%, 25% and 27%, respectively) compared with RB (24%, 13% and 10%). Faecal calprotectin and inflammatory cytokine expression were higher in patients with active disease compared with patients with mucosal healing, but there were no differences between patients using increasingly stringent definitions of mucosal healing.

conclusionsEndoscopically inactive disease is associated with absence of RB but not with complete normalisation of SF. Achieving histological remission did not improve symptomatic relief. In addition, in these patients, higher inflammatory biomarker levels were not observed. These data suggest that non-inflammatory changes, such as bowel damage, may contribute to SF in UC.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultBiomarkersBiopsyColitis, UlcerativeCytokinesFecesFemaleHumansIntestinal MucosaLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMaleRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityWound HealingBiomarkersCytokinesLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexDIARRHOEAENDOSCOPYGASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDINGHISTOPATHOLOGYULCERATIVE COLITIS

Identifiers

PMID27590995
PMCPMC5749342
OpenAlexW2518658233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.