ArticleBMC genomics2016
An analytical workflow for accurate variant discovery in highly divergent regions.
Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Replication stress increases de novo CNVs across the malaria parasite genome.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Replication stress increases de novo CNVs across the malaria parasite genome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- UNISOM: Unified Somatic Calling and Machine Learning-based Classification Enhance the Discovery of CHIP.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Evaluating the performance of low-frequency variant calling tools for the detection of variants from short-read deep sequencing data.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Hereditary Basis of Coat Color and Excellent Feed Conversion Rate of Red Angus Cattle by Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Personalized HLA typing leads to the discovery of novel HLA alleles and tumor-specific HLA variants.HLA · 2022Article
- iWhale: a computational pipeline based on Docker and SCons for detection and annotation of somatic variants in cancer WES data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Performance evaluation of pipelines for mapping, variant calling and interval padding, for the analysis of NGS germline panels.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) risk is mediated by multiple enhancer variants within CLL risk loci.Human molecular genetics · 2020Article
- Evaluation of methods for detecting human reads in microbial sequencing datasets.Microbial genomics · 2020Article
- Genomic diversity affects the accuracy of bacterial single-nucleotide polymorphism-calling pipelines.GigaScience · 2020Article
- Overcoming challenges in variant calling: exploring sequence diversity in candidate genes for plant development in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne).DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2019Article
- Comparative analysis of de novo assemblers for variation discovery in personal genomes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Optimized Method of Extracting Rice Chloroplast DNA for High-Quality Plastome Resequencing andFrontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- A comparison of genotyping-by-sequencing analysis methods on low-coverage crop datasets shows advantages of a new workflow, GB-eaSy.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent variant discovery methods often start with the mapping of short reads to a reference genome; yet, their performance deteriorates in genomic regions where the reads are highly divergent from the reference sequence. This is particularly problematic for the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region on chromosome 6p21.3. This region is associated with over 100 diseases, but variant calling is hindered by the extreme divergence across different haplotypes.
resultsWe simulated reads from chromosome 6 exonic regions over a wide range of sequence divergence and coverage depth. We systematically assessed combinations between five mappers and five callers for their performance on simulated data and exome-seq data from NA12878, a well-studied individual in which multiple public call sets have been generated. Among those combinations, the number of known SNPs differed by about 5 % in the non-HLA regions of chromosome 6 but over 20 % in the HLA region. Notably, GSNAP mapping combined with GATK UnifiedGenotyper calling identified about 20 % more known SNPs than most existing methods without a noticeable loss of specificity, with 100 % sensitivity in three highly polymorphic HLA genes examined. Much larger differences were observed among these combinations in INDEL calling from both non-HLA and HLA regions. We obtained similar results with our internal exome-seq data from a cohort of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients.
conclusionsWe have established a workflow enabling variant detection, with high sensitivity and specificity, over the full spectrum of divergence seen in the human genome. Comparing to public call sets from NA12878 has highlighted the overall superiority of GATK UnifiedGenotyper, followed by GATK HaplotypeCaller and SAMtools, in SNP calling, and of GATK HaplotypeCaller and Platypus in INDEL calling, particularly in regions of high sequence divergence such as the HLA region. GSNAP and Novoalign are the ideal mappers in combination with the above callers. We expect that the proposed workflow should be applicable to variant discovery in other highly divergent regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.