ReviewClinical journal of gastroenterology2016
Two-year follow-up period showing the natural history of a superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma arising in a long segment of Barrett's esophagus.
Review in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 55-year-old woman experienced gastrointestinal dysfunction caused by scleroderma. An initial endoscopy revealed an erosive lesion in a long segment of Barrett's esophagus, and a biopsy led to a diagnosis of ectopic gastric mucosa. Two years later, an irregular, elevated tumor developed at the same site. This tumor was suspected of having invaded the submucosal layer. A second biopsy led to a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. The patient subsequently underwent a thoracoscopic esophagectomy. The resected specimen revealed an invasive tumor front that had invaded the deep layer of a duplicated muscularis mucosae. Intraepithelial neoplasia partially surrounded the tumor. This lesion was thought to have developed into an adenocarcinoma according to the orderly sequence of metaplasia, intraepithelial neoplasia and finally adenocarcinoma over a 2-year period. The present case suggests that erosive lesions in Barrett's esophagus should be strictly followed up by endoscopy, even if a biopsy does not reveal any neoplastic findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.