Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27590620›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

Antimicrobial-coated sutures to decrease surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

X Wu, N Z Kubilay, J Ren, B Allegranzi, P Bischoff, B Zayed, D Pittet, J Li

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A review of current advancements for wound healing: Biomaterial applications and medical devices.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

X WuDepartment of Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002, China.
N Z KubilayInfection Prevention and Control Unit, Department of Service Delivery & Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
J RenDepartment of Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002, China. JiananR@gmail.com.
B AllegranziInfection Prevention and Control Unit, Department of Service Delivery & Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
P BischoffInstitute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
B ZayedInfection Prevention and Control Unit, Department of Service Delivery & Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
D PittetInfection Control Programme, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
J LiDepartment of Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002, China.
World Health Organization · CHNanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CNCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DENanjing University · CNUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the effectiveness of antimicrobial-coated sutures compared with non-coated sutures in reducing surgical site infection (SSI) and develop recommendations for World Health Organization (WHO) SSI prevention guidelines. We searched Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and WHO Global Health from 1990-16/02/2015 with language restricted to English, Spanish, and French. Meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model. Meta-regression analysis assessed whether the effect of antimicrobial coating changed according to the type of suture and surgery. Subgroup analyses were based on types of sutures. Quality of the retrieved evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five observational studies (OBSs) met the inclusion criteria. Antimicrobial sutures significantly reduced SSI risk (for RCTs: OR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.59-0.88, p = 0.001, I

Indexed as

Suture TechniquesAdolescentAdultAnti-Infective AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCoated Materials, BiocompatibleFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentSurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Infective AgentsCoated Materials, Biocompatible

Identifiers

PMID27590620
OpenAlexW2509984816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.