Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27590335›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2016

Phosphorus uptake, partitioning and redistribution during grain filling in rice.

Cécile Julia, Matthias Wissuwa, Tobias Kretzschmar, Kwanho Jeong, Terry Rose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Response of rice production to rising COFundamental research · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Rice breeding for low input agriculture.Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. SustainableFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Specific HProtoplasma · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cécile JuliaSouthern Cross Plant Science, Southern Cross University, PO Box 57, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia Southern Cross GeoScience, Southern Cross University, PO Box 57, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia cecile.julia@scu.edu.au terry.rose@scu.edu.au.
Matthias WissuwaCrop, Livestock and Environment Division, Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, 1-1 Ohwashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8686, Japan.
Tobias KretzschmarGenotyping Services Laboratory, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), DAPO BOX 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Kwanho JeongSouthern Cross Plant Science, Southern Cross University, PO Box 57, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia Southern Cross GeoScience, Southern Cross University, PO Box 57, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.
Terry RoseSouthern Cross Plant Science, Southern Cross University, PO Box 57, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia Southern Cross GeoScience, Southern Cross University, PO Box 57, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia cecile.julia@scu.edu.au terry.rose@scu.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS AND

aimsIn cultivated rice, phosphorus (P) in grains originates from two possible sources, namely exogenous (post-flowering root P uptake from soil) or endogenous (P remobilization from vegetative parts) sources. This study investigates P partitioning and remobilization in rice plants throughout grain filling to resolve contributions of P sources to grain P levels in rice.

methodsRice plants (Oryza sativa 'IR64') were grown under P-sufficient or P-deficient conditions in the field and in hydroponics. Post-flowering uptake, partitioning and re-partitioning of P was investigated by quantifying tissue P levels over the grain filling period in the field conditions, and by employing KEY

resultsPost-flowering P uptake represented 40-70 % of the aerial plant P accumulation at maturity. The panicle was the main P sink in all studies, and the amount of P potentially remobilized from vegetative tissues to the panicle during grain filling was around 20 % of the total aerial P measured at flowering. In hydroponics, less than 20 % of the P tracer taken up at 9 d after flowering (DAF) was found in the above-ground tissues at 14 DAF and half of it was partitioned to the panicle in both P treatments.

conclusionsThe results demonstrate that P uptake from the soil during grain filling is a critical contributor to the P content in grains in irrigated rice. The P tracer study suggests that the mechanism of P loading into grains involves little direct transfer of post-flowering P uptake to the grain but rather substantial mobilization of P that was previously taken up and stored in vegetative tissues.

Indexed as

HydroponicsOryzaPhosphorusPhosphorus RadioisotopesPlant LeavesPlant StemsSeedsPhosphorusPhosphorus Radioisotopes33P tracerP fluxesP loading into grainspost-flowering P uptakeP partitioningP remobilization

Identifiers

PMID27590335
PMCPMC5091725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.