Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27589901›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2016

Steering cell migration by alternating blebs and actin-rich protrusions.

Alba Diz-Muñoz, Pawel Romanczuk, Weimiao Yu, Martin Bergert, Kenzo Ivanovitch, Guillaume Salbreux, Carl-Philipp Heisenberg, Ewa K Paluch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alba Diz-MuñozMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, 01307, Germany. alba.dizmunoz@embl.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6864-8901
Pawel RomanczukMax Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, 01187, Germany. pawel.romanczuk@hu-berlin.de.
Weimiao YuInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, A-STAR, Singapore, 138673, Singapore.
Martin BergertMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, 01307, Germany.
Kenzo IvanovitchMedical Research Council Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
Guillaume SalbreuxMax Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, 01187, Germany.
Carl-Philipp HeisenbergInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, 3400, Austria.
Ewa K PaluchMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, 01307, Germany.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 21144Cancer Research UK FC001317Medical Research Council FC001317Medical Research Council MC_UP_1205/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12018/5Wellcome Trust FC001317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh directional persistence is often assumed to enhance the efficiency of chemotactic migration. Yet, cells in vivo usually display meandering trajectories with relatively low directional persistence, and the control and function of directional persistence during cell migration in three-dimensional environments are poorly understood.

resultsHere, we use mesendoderm progenitors migrating during zebrafish gastrulation as a model system to investigate the control of directional persistence during migration in vivo. We show that progenitor cells alternate persistent run phases with tumble phases that result in cell reorientation. Runs are characterized by the formation of directed actin-rich protrusions and tumbles by enhanced blebbing. Increasing the proportion of actin-rich protrusions or blebs leads to longer or shorter run phases, respectively. Importantly, both reducing and increasing run phases result in larger spatial dispersion of the cells, indicative of reduced migration precision. A physical model quantitatively recapitulating the migratory behavior of mesendoderm progenitors indicates that the ratio of tumbling to run times, and thus the specific degree of directional persistence of migration, are critical for optimizing migration precision.

conclusionsTogether, our experiments and model provide mechanistic insight into the control of migration directionality for cells moving in three-dimensional environments that combine different protrusion types, whereby the proportion of blebs to actin-rich protrusions determines the directional persistence and precision of movement by regulating the ratio of tumbling to run times.

Indexed as

Cell MovementActinsAnimalsEndodermMesodermMorpholinosPseudopodiaStem CellsZebrafishActinsMorpholinosActin-rich protrusionBlebCell migrationDirectionalityPersistenceProtrusion orientationRun and tumble

Identifiers

PMID27589901
PMCPMC5010735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.