ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2017
An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool?
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05218837 (Research Plan for Development and Validation of a Logistic Regression Derived Algorithm to Estimate the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in High- and Low-risk Scenarios.), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Research Plan for Development and Validation of a Logistic Regression Derived Algorithm to Estimate the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in High- and Low-risk Scenarios.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in Nulliparous Women: Model Development and Temporal Validation.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
- An International Continence Society (ICS)/ International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) joint report on the terminology for the assessment and management of obstetric pelvic floor disorders.International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
- Predicting perineal trauma during childbirth using data from a general obstetric population.HRB open research · 2022Article
- Feasibility and safety of antepartum tactile imaging.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
- In vivo assessment of the levator ani muscles using shear wave elastography: a feasibility study in women.International urogynecology journal · 2019Article
- Does water birth affect the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury? Development of a prognostic model.International urogynecology journal · 2019Article
- Is increased peripheral ligamentous laxity in term pregnant women associated with obstetric anal sphincter injury?International urogynecology journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisTo establish the contribution of maternal, fetal and intrapartum factors to the risk of incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and assess the feasibility of an OASIS risk prediction model based on variables available to clinicians prior to birth.
methodsThis was a population-based, retrospective cohort study using single-site data from the birth database of Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. The participants were all women who had a singleton vaginal birth during the period 1989 to 2006. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using multiple imputations for missing data and internally validated using bootstrap methods. The main outcome measures were the contributions of maternal, fetal and intrapartum events to the incidence of OASIS.
resultsA total of 71,469 women met the inclusion criteria, of whom 1,754 (2.45 %) sustained OASIS. In the multivariate analysis of variables known prior to birth, maternal age 20 - 30 years (OR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.44 - 1.89) and ≥30 years (OR 1.60, 95 % CI 1.39 - 1.85), occipitoposterior fetal position (OR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.06 - 1.70), induction/augmentation of labour (OR 1.46, 95 % CI 1.32 - 1.62), and suspected macrosomia (OR 2.20, 95 % CI 1.97 - 2.45) were independent significant predictors of OASIS, with increasing parity conferring a significant protective effect. The 'prebirth variable' model showed a 95 % sensitivity and a 24 % specificity in predicting OASIS with 1 % probability, and a 3 % sensitivity and a 99 % specificity in predicting OASIS with a 10 % probability.
conclusionsOur model identified several significant OASIS risk factors that are known prior to actual birth. The prognostic model shows potential for ruling out OASIS (high sensitivity with a low risk cut-off value), but is not useful for ruling in the event.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.