Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27589856›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2017

An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool?

Sara S Webb, Karla Hemming, Madhi Y Khalfaoui, Tine Brink Henriksen, Sara Kindberg, Stine Stensgaard, Christine Kettle, Khaled M K Ismail

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05218837 (Research Plan for Development and Validation of a Logistic Regression Derived Algorithm to Estimate the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in High- and Low-risk Scenarios.), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05218837 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Research Plan for Development and Validation of a Logistic Regression Derived Algorithm to Estimate the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in High- and Low-risk Scenarios.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMaria GyhagenRan2018 to 2018Enrolled800,000ConditionsSphincter (Anal), Perineal Rupture, ObstetricArmsVaginal birth
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Feasibility and safety of antepartum tactile imaging.International urogynecology journal · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara S WebbInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. webbyali@blueyonder.co.uk.
Karla HemmingInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Madhi Y KhalfaouiSchool of surgery, North Western Deanery, Manchester, UK.
Tine Brink HenriksenPerinatal Epidemiology Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sara KindbergPerinatal Epidemiology Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Stine StensgaardPerinatal Epidemiology Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Christine KettleStaffordshire University, Stafford, UK.
Khaled M K IsmailInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

Department of Health CDRF-2012-03-064Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisTo establish the contribution of maternal, fetal and intrapartum factors to the risk of incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and assess the feasibility of an OASIS risk prediction model based on variables available to clinicians prior to birth.

methodsThis was a population-based, retrospective cohort study using single-site data from the birth database of Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. The participants were all women who had a singleton vaginal birth during the period 1989 to 2006. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using multiple imputations for missing data and internally validated using bootstrap methods. The main outcome measures were the contributions of maternal, fetal and intrapartum events to the incidence of OASIS.

resultsA total of 71,469 women met the inclusion criteria, of whom 1,754 (2.45 %) sustained OASIS. In the multivariate analysis of variables known prior to birth, maternal age 20 - 30 years (OR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.44 - 1.89) and ≥30 years (OR 1.60, 95 % CI 1.39 - 1.85), occipitoposterior fetal position (OR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.06 - 1.70), induction/augmentation of labour (OR 1.46, 95 % CI 1.32 - 1.62), and suspected macrosomia (OR 2.20, 95 % CI 1.97 - 2.45) were independent significant predictors of OASIS, with increasing parity conferring a significant protective effect. The 'prebirth variable' model showed a 95 % sensitivity and a 24 % specificity in predicting OASIS with 1 % probability, and a 3 % sensitivity and a 99 % specificity in predicting OASIS with a 10 % probability.

conclusionsOur model identified several significant OASIS risk factors that are known prior to actual birth. The prognostic model shows potential for ruling out OASIS (high sensitivity with a low risk cut-off value), but is not useful for ruling in the event.

Indexed as

AdultAnal CanalBirth WeightDelivery, ObstetricDenmarkFemaleHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornLacerationsLogistic ModelsObstetric Labor ComplicationsPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentCohort studyOASISPredictor variablesPrognostic modelRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID27589856
PMCPMC5331086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.