ArticleOncotarget2016
A characteristic biosignature for discrimination of gastric cancer from healthy population by high throughput GC-MS analysis.
Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Gastric cancer detection by non-blood-based liquid biopsies: A systematic review looking into the last decade of research.United European gastroenterology journal · 2023Pooled it
- Vibrational Spectroscopy Saliva Profiling as Biometric Tool for Disease Diagnostics: A Systematic Literature.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Pooled it
- Machine Learning-Based Profiling of Urinary Volatile Organic Compounds Reveals Distinct Diagnostic Signatures for Gastric Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Quantification of gastric cancer biomarkers in the urine matrix by high internal phase emulsion polymer-based µsolid-phase extraction followed by HPLC-MS/MS.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Integrated analysis of microbiota and gut microbial metabolites in blood for breast cancer.mSystems · 2024Article
- Landscape of Innovative Methods for Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Polarity-regulated derivatization-assisted LC-MS method for amino-containing metabolites profiling in gastric cancer.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2023Article
- Article
- Urinary Biomarkers for the Noninvasive Detection of Gastric Cancer.Journal of gastric cancer · 2022Review
- Urine NMR Metabolomics for Precision Oncology in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Serum metabolomic profiling for patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2022Article
- Comprehensive molecular characterization and identification of prognostic signature in stomach adenocarcinoma on the basis of energy-metabolism-related genes.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Article
- Kynurenine and Anthranilic Acid in the Peritoneum Correlate With the Stage of Gastric Cancer Disease.International journal of tryptophan research : IJTR · 2022Article
- Alterations in the gastric microbiota and metabolites in gastric cancer: An update review.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Review
- Metabolomics of Gastric Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Urinary Volatile Organic Compound Analysis for the Diagnosis of Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Quality Assessment.Metabolites · 2020Review
- Effect of Added Dietary Betaine and Soluble Fiber on Metabolites and Fecal Microbiome in Dogs with Early Renal Disease.Metabolites · 2020Article
- Pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase 1 (PYCR1) upregulation contributes to gastric cancer progression and indicates poor survival outcome.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Magnetic organic porous polymer as a solid-phase extraction adsorbent for enrichment and quantitation of gastric cancer biomarkers (P-cresol and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid) in urine samples by UPLC.Mikrochimica acta · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of gastric cancer is crucial to improve patient' outcome. A good biomarker will function in early diagnosis for gastric cancer. In order to find practical and cost-effective biomarkers, we used gas chromatography combined mass spectrometer (GC-MS) to profile urinary metabolites on 293 urine samples. Ninety-four samples are taken as training set, others for validating study. Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA), significance analysis of microarray (SAM) and Mann-Whitney U test are used for data analysis. The diagnostic value of urinary metabolites was evaluated by ROC curve. As results, Seventeen metabolites are significantly different between patients and healthy controls in training set. Among them, 14 metabolites show diagnostic value better than classic blood biomarkers by quantitative assay on validation set. Ten of them are amino acids and four are organic metabolites. Importantly, proline, p-cresol and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid disclose outcome-prediction value by means of survival analysis. Therefore, the examination of urinary metabolites is a promising noninvasive strategy for gastric cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.