Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27589603›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2016

The neural control of heartbeat in invertebrates.

Ronald L Calabrese, Brian J Norris, Angela Wenning

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Circuit-constrained molecular neuroethology in the medicinal leech Hirudo verbana.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Wesley J. Thompson (1947-2019).Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Use of theJournal of neurophysiology · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ronald L CalabreseDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: biolrc@emory.edu.
Brian J NorrisDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State University, San Marcos, USA.
Angela WenningDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

Funding

Constancy and Variability in a Motor Program: CPG to Motor PerformanceR01NS085006 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CALABRESE, RONALD L · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neurogenic heartbeat of certain invertebrates has long been studied both as a way of understanding how automatic functions are regulated and for how neuronal networks generate the inherent rhythmic activity that controls and coordinates this vital function. This review focuses on the heartbeat of decapod crustaceans and hirudinid leeches, which remain important experimental systems for the exploration of central pattern generator networks, their properties, network and cellular mechanisms, modulation, and how animal-to-animal variation in neuronal and network properties are managed to produce functional output.

Indexed as

Nervous System Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCrustaceaHeart RateLeechesPeriodicity

Identifiers

PMID27589603
PMCPMC5123911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.