Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27589479›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2017

Supraspinal control of spinal reflex responses to body bending during different behaviours in lampreys.

Li-Ju Hsu, Pavel V Zelenin, Grigori N Orlovsky, Tatiana G Deliagina

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Increasing Viscosity Helps Explain Locomotor Control in SwimmingIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li-Ju HsuDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pavel V ZeleninDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Grigori N OrlovskyDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tatiana G DeliaginaDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsSpinal reflexes are substantial components of the motor control system in all vertebrates and centrally driven reflex modifications are essential to many behaviours, but little is known about the neuronal mechanisms underlying these modifications. To study this issue, we took advantage of an in vitro brainstem-spinal cord preparation of the lamprey (a lower vertebrate), in which spinal reflex responses to spinal cord bending (caused by signals from spinal stretch receptor neurons) can be evoked during different types of fictive behaviour. Our results demonstrate that reflexes observed during fast forward swimming are reversed during escape behaviours, with the reflex reversal presumably caused by supraspinal commands transmitted by a population of reticulospinal neurons. NMDA receptors are involved in the formation of these commands, which are addressed primarily to the ipsilateral spinal networks. In the present study the neuronal mechanisms underlying reflex reversal have been characterized for the first time. ABSTRACT: Spinal reflexes can be modified during different motor behaviours. However, our knowledge about the neuronal mechanisms underlying these modifications in vertebrates is scarce. In the lamprey, a lower vertebrate, body bending causes activation of intraspinal stretch receptor neurons (SRNs) resulting in spinal reflexes: activation of motoneurons (MNs) with bending towards either the contralateral or ipsilateral side (a convex or concave response, respectively). The present study had two main aims: (i) to investigate how these spinal reflexes are modified during different motor behaviours, and (ii) to reveal reticulospinal neurons (RSNs) transmitting commands for the reflex modification. For this purpose in in vitro brainstem-spinal cord preparation, RSNs and reflex responses to bending were recorded during different fictive behaviours evoked by supraspinal commands. We found that during fast forward swimming MNs exhibited convex responses. By contrast, during escape behaviours, MNs exhibited concave responses. We found RSNs that were activated during both stimulation causing reflex reversal without initiation of any specific behaviour, and stimulation causing reflex reversal during escape behaviour. We suggest that these RSNs transmit commands for the reflex modification. Application of the NMDA antagonist (AP-5) to the brainstem significantly decreased the reversed reflex, suggesting involvement of NMDA receptors in the formation of these commands. Longitudinal split of the spinal cord did not abolish the reflex reversal caused by supraspinal commands, suggesting an important role for ipsilateral networks in determining this type of motor response. This is the first study to reveal the neuronal mechanisms underlying supraspinal control of reflex reversal.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrain StemLampreysNeuronsReflexSpinal CordSwimminglocomotionreticulospinal neuronsspinal reflexes

Identifiers

PMID27589479
PMCPMC5285725
OpenAlexW2511113685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.