Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27589057›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Functional and Psychosocial Outcomes of Hand Transplantation Compared with Prosthetic Fitting in Below-Elbow Amputees: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Stefan Salminger, Agnes Sturma, Aidan D Roche, Laura A Hruby, Tatjana Paternostro-Sluga, Martin Kumnig, Marina Ninkovic, Gerhard Pierer, Stefan Schneeberger, Markus Gabl and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hand Transplantation-Risks and Benefits.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. MUW researcher of the month.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Outcomes after hand and upper extremity transplantation.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan SalmingerDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Agnes SturmaChristian Doppler Laboratory for Restoration of Extremity Function, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Aidan D RocheChristian Doppler Laboratory for Restoration of Extremity Function, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Laura A HrubyChristian Doppler Laboratory for Restoration of Extremity Function, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Tatjana Paternostro-SlugaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Danube Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin KumnigCenter for Advanced Psychology in Plastic and Transplant Surgery, Department of Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Marina NinkovicDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Gerhard PiererDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stefan SchneebergerDepartments of General and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Markus GablDepartment of Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Adam ChelmonskiHand Trauma Center, St. Hedwigs's Hospital, Trzebnica, Subdepartment of Replantation of Limbs, Trzebnica, Poland.
Jerzy JableckiHand Trauma Center, St. Hedwigs's Hospital, Trzebnica, Subdepartment of Replantation of Limbs, Trzebnica, Poland.
Oskar C AszmannDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATUniversität Innsbruck · ATInnsbruck Medical University · ATPublic Higher Medical Professional School in Opole · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHand-transplantation and improvements in the field of prostheses opened new frontiers in restoring hand function in below-elbow amputees. Both concepts aim at restoring reliable hand function, however, the indications, advantages and limitations for each treatment must be carefully considered depending on level and extent of amputation. Here we report our findings of a multi-center cohort study comparing hand function and quality-of-life of people with transplanted versus prosthetic hands.

methodsHand function in amputees with either transplant or prostheses was tested with Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand measure (DASH). Quality-of-life was compared with the Short-Form 36 (SF-36).

resultsTransplanted patients (n = 5) achieved a mean ARAT score of 40.86 ± 8.07 and an average SHAP score of 75.00 ± 11.06. Prosthetic patients (n = 7) achieved a mean ARAT score of 39.00 ± 3.61 and an average SHAP score of 75.43 ± 10.81. There was no significant difference between transplanted and prosthetic hands in ARAT, SHAP or DASH. While quality-of-life metrics were equivocal for four scales of the SF-36, transplanted patients reported significantly higher scores in "role-physical" (p = 0.006), "vitality" (p = 0.008), "role-emotional" (p = 0.035) and "mental-health" (p = 0.003).

conclusionsThe indications for hand transplantation or prosthetic fitting in below-elbow amputees require careful consideration. As functional outcomes were not significantly different between groups, patient's best interests and the route of least harm should guide treatment. Due to the immunosuppressive side-effects, the indication for allotransplantation must still be restrictive, the best being bilateral amputees.

Indexed as

AdultAmputeesArtificial LimbsCohort StudiesHandHand TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27589057
PMCPMC5010226
OpenAlexW2513272305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.