Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27588902›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Differences in cooperative behavior among Damaraland mole rats are consequences of an age-related polyethism.

Markus Zöttl, Philippe Vullioud, Rute Mendonça, Miquel Torrents Ticó, David Gaynor, Adam Mitchell, Tim Clutton-Brock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Workload distribution in wild Damaraland mole-rat groups.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Division of labour in colony defence in a clonal ant.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Division of labour as key driver of social evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Helping niches may trigger the development of task specialization and division of labour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. The evolution of division of labour: preconditions and evolutionary feedback.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Markus ZöttlDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB23EJ, United Kingdom; mz338@cam.ac.uk.
Philippe VullioudDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB23EJ, United Kingdom;
Rute MendonçaDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, 0028 Pretoria, South Africa; Institute of Biology, University of Neuchatel, Rue Emile-Argand 11, CH-2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland;
Miquel Torrents TicóDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB23EJ, United Kingdom; Kalahari Mole-Rat Project, Kuruman River Reserve, 8467 Van Zylsrus, South Africa.
David GaynorDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, 0028 Pretoria, South Africa;
Adam MitchellKalahari Mole-Rat Project, Kuruman River Reserve, 8467 Van Zylsrus, South Africa.
Tim Clutton-BrockDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB23EJ, United Kingdom; Department of Zoology and Entomology, Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, 0028 Pretoria, South Africa;

Funding

European Research Council 294494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many cooperative breeders, the contributions of helpers to cooperative activities change with age, resulting in age-related polyethisms. In contrast, some studies of social mole rats (including naked mole rats, Heterocephalus glaber, and Damaraland mole rats, Fukomys damarensis) suggest that individual differences in cooperative behavior are the result of divergent developmental pathways, leading to discrete and permanent functional categories of helpers that resemble the caste systems found in eusocial insects. Here we show that, in Damaraland mole rats, individual contributions to cooperative behavior increase with age and are higher in fast-growing individuals. Individual contributions to different cooperative tasks are intercorrelated and repeatability of cooperative behavior is similar to that found in other cooperatively breeding vertebrates. Our data provide no evidence that nonreproductive individuals show divergent developmental pathways or specialize in particular tasks. Instead of representing a caste system, variation in the behavior of nonreproductive individuals in Damaraland mole rats closely resembles that found in other cooperatively breeding mammals and appears to be a consequence of age-related polyethism.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorAgingAnimalsBody WeightBreedingFemaleMaleMole RatsRatsSexual Behavior, AnimalSocial Behaviorcastecooperative breedingdivision of laboreusocialitysocial mole rats

Identifiers

PMID27588902
PMCPMC5027444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.