Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27588681›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Mechanisms by Which 17β-Estradiol (E2) Suppress Neuronal cox-2 Gene Expression.

Winfred Stacey, Shreyas Bhave, Rosalie M Uht

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Winfred StaceyGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America.
Shreyas BhaveGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America.
Rosalie M UhtGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America.
University of North Texas · US

Funding

GR-Mediated Epigenetic Regulation of the CRH GeneR01MH082900 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI UHT, ROSALIE MARIE · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH082900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E2 attenuates inflammatory responses by suppressing expression of pro-inflammatory genes. Given that inflammation is increasingly being associated with neurodegenerative and psychiatric processes, we sought to elucidate mechanisms by which E2 down-regulates a component of an inflammatory response, cyclooxygenase- 2 (COX-2) expression. Although inflammatory processes in the brain are usually associated with microglia and astrocytes, we found that the COX-2 gene (cox-2) was expressed in a neuronal context, specifically in an amygdalar cell line (AR-5). Given that COX-2 has been reported to be in neurons in the brain, and that the amygdala is a site involved in neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric processes, we investigated mechanisms by which E2 could down-regulate cox-2 expression in the AR-5 line. These cells express estrogen receptors alpha (ERα) and beta (ERβ), and as shown here cox-2. At the level of RNA, E2 and the ERβ selective ligand diarylpropionitrile (DPN) both attenuated gene expression, whereas the ERα selective ligand propyl pyrazole triol (PPT) had no effect. Neither ligand increased ERβ at the cox-2 promoter. Rather, DPN decreased promoter occupancy of NF-κB p65 and histone 4 (H4) acetylation. Treatment with the non-specific HDAC inhibitor Trichostatin A (TSA) counteracted DPN's repressive effects on cox-2 expression. In keeping with the TSA effect, E2 and DPN increased histone deacetylase one (HDAC1) and switch-independent 3A (Sin3A) promoter occupancy. Lastly, even though E2 increased CpG methylation, DPN did not. Taken together, the pharmacological data indicate that ERβ contributes to neuronal cox-2 expression, as measured by RNA levels. Furthermore, ER ligands lead to increased recruitment of HDAC1, Sin3A and a concomitant reduction of p65 occupancy and Ac-H4 levels. None of the events, however, are associated with a significant recruitment of ERβ at the promoter. Thus, ERβ directs recruitment to the cox-2 promoter, but does so in the absence of being recruited itself.

Indexed as

AmygdalaAnimalsCell LineCyclooxygenase 2Down-RegulationEstradiolEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor betaGene ExpressionNeuronsNitrilesPhenolsPropionatesPyrazolesRats2,3-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-propionitrile4,4',4''-(4-propyl-((1)H)-pyrazole-1,3,5-triyl) tris-phenolCyclooxygenase 2EstradiolEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor betaNitrilesPhenolsPropionatesPyrazoles

Identifiers

PMID27588681
PMCPMC5010190
OpenAlexW2225673876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.