Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27588569›Full record

ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2016

Sociopolitical contexts for addiction recovery: Anexos in U.S. Latino communities.

Anna Pagano, Victor García, Carlos Recarte, Juliet P Lee

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Developing the Juramento into an Evidence-Based Brief Intervention: A Brief Report.Hispanic health care international : the official journal of the National Association of Hispanic Nurses · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Alcoholism treatment quarterly · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. TheJournal of groups in addiction & recovery · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna PaganoPrevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 180 Grand Ave, Suite 1200, Oakland, CA 94612, USA. Electronic address: apagano@prev.org.
Victor GarcíaDepartment of Anthropology, G1 McElhaney Hall, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA 15701, USA; Mid-Atlantic Addiction Research and Training Institute (MARTI), 107E Stright Hall, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA 15701, USA.
Carlos RecartePrevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 180 Grand Ave, Suite 1200, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
Juliet P LeePrevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 180 Grand Ave, Suite 1200, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.

Funding

Latino Migrant Laborers' Use of Drug Abuse Recovery HousesR21DA037380 · NIDA · PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RES AND EVALUATION · PI PAGANO, ANNA L · 2014 to 2015
$459k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA037380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnexos are community-based recovery houses that were created in Mexico to serve people struggling with addiction to alcohol and other drugs. Brought to the U.S. by Mexican migrants, anexos provide residential care to primarily male Latino migrants and immigrants who are unable or unwilling to access formal treatment. While some Mexican anexos have come under fire for coercion, confrontational treatment methods, and corporal punishment, little is known about treatment practices in U.S. anexos.

methodsWe conducted a two-year ethnographic study of three anexos in urban Northern California. The study included over 150h of participant observation and semi-structured interviews with 42 residents, 3 directors, 2 assistant directors, and 3 former directors (N=50). Qualitative data were analyzed thematically using ATLAS.ti software.

resultsThe anexos in our study differed in important ways from Mexican anexos described in the scientific literature. First, we found no evidence of corporal punishment or coercive internment. Second, the anexos were open, allowing residents to leave the premises for work and other approved activities. Third, the anexos were self-supported through residents' financial contributions. Fourth, collective decision-making processes observed in the California anexos more closely resembled sober living houses than their authoritarian counterparts in Mexico.

conclusionAnexos may operate differently in the U.S. versus Mexico due to variations in sociopolitical context. This exploratory study suggests that anexos are addressing unmet need for addiction treatment in U.S. Latino immigrant and migrant communities. As a community-created, self-sustained, culturally appropriate recovery resource, anexos provide important insights into Latino migrants' and immigrants' experiences with substance abuse, help-seeking trajectories, and treatment needs.

Indexed as

AlcoholicsDrug UsersEmigrants and ImmigrantsHispanic or LatinoSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersAdolescentAdultAlcoholismAnthropology, CulturalCaliforniaCoercionFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansIncomeInterviews as TopicAddictionAlcoholDrugImmigrantsLatinosRecovery

Identifiers

PMID27588569
PMCPMC5102756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.