Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27588488›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

HuR silencing elicits oxidative stress and DNA damage and sensitizes human triple-negative breast cancer cells to radiotherapy.

Meghna Mehta, Kanthesh Basalingappa, James N Griffith, Daniel Andrade, Anish Babu, Narsireddy Amreddy, Ranganayaki Muralidharan, Myriam Gorospe, Terence Herman, Wei-Qun Ding and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05724706 (An Evaluation of Salivary Oxidant and Antioxidant Levels in Peri-implant Health and Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05724706 completednot on this map

An Evaluation of Salivary Oxidant and Antioxidant Levels in Peri-implant Health and Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorBiruni UniversityRan2016 to 2018Enrolled88ConditionsPeri-Implantitis, Bone Loss in Jaw, Dental Implant Failed, Dental Implant Failure Nos
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Application of nano-radiosensitizers in combination cancer therapy.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meghna MehtaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Kanthesh BasalingappaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
James N GriffithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Daniel AndradeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Anish BabuDepartment of Pathology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Narsireddy AmreddyDepartment of Pathology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Ranganayaki MuralidharanDepartment of Pathology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Myriam GorospeNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Terence HermanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Wei-Qun DingDepartment of Pathology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Rajagopal RameshDepartment of Pathology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Anupama MunshiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USNational Institute on Aging · US

Funding

Post-transcriptional Regulation Of Proliferative and Stress Response GenesZIAAG000511 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI GOROSPE, MYRIAM · 2009 to 2025
$25.4M
TUMOR RESISTANCE MECHANISMS TO ANTI-VEGF THERAPY IN PROSTATE CANCER (Sukyung Woo)P20GM103639 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI HANNAFON, BETHANY · 2012 to 2022
$21.3M
HuR Targeted Nanotherapy for Lung CancerR01CA167516 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI RAMESH, RAJAGOPAL · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA167516NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HuR is an mRNA-binding protein whose overexpression in cancer cells has been associated with poor prognosis and resistance to therapy. While reports on HuR overexpression contributing to chemoresistance exist, limited information is available on HuR and radioresistance especially in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).In this study we investigated the role of HuR in radiation resistance in three TNBC (MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468 and Hs578t) cell lines. Endogenous HuR expression was higher in TNBC cells compared to normal cells. siRNA mediated knockdown of HuR (siHuR) markedly reduced HuR mRNA and protein levels compared to scrambled siRNA (siScr) treatment. Further, siHuR treatment sensitized TNBC cells to ionizing radiation at 2 Gy compared to siScr treatment as evidenced by the significant reduction in clonogenic cell survival from 59%, 49%, and 65% in siScr-treated cells to 40%, 33%, and 46% in siHuR-treated MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468 and Hs578t cells, respectively. Molecular studies showed increased ROS production and inhibition of thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) in HuR knockdown cells contributed to radiosensitization. Associated with increased ROS production was evidence of increased DNA damage, demonstrated by a significant increase (p < 0.05) in γ-H2AX foci that persisted for up to 24 h in siHuR plus radiation treated cells compared to control cells. Further, comet assay revealed that HuR-silenced cells had larger and longer-lasting tails than control cells, indicating higher levels of DNA damage. In conclusion, our studies demonstrate that HuR knockdown in TNBC cells elicits oxidative stress and DNA damage resulting in radiosensitization.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaApoptosisCell Line, TumorComet AssayDNA DamageELAV-Like Protein 1FemaleHumansOxidative StressRadiation, IonizingRadiation ToleranceReactive Oxygen SpeciesRNA, Small InterferingThioredoxin-Disulfide ReductaseTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsELAVL1 protein, humanELAV-Like Protein 1Reactive Oxygen SpeciesRNA, Small InterferingThioredoxin-Disulfide Reductasebreast cancerDNA repairHuRradiationsiRNA

Identifiers

PMID27588488
PMCPMC5323119
OpenAlexW2517290979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.