Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27588226›Full record

ArticleCureus2016

Treatment Planning Considerations for Robotic Guided Cardiac Radiosurgery for Atrial Fibrillation.

Oliver Blanck, Svenja Ipsen, Mark K Chan, Ralf Bauer, Matthias Kerl, Peter Hunold, Volkmar Jacobi, Ralf Bruder, Achim Schweikard, Dirk Rades and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advantages and challenges for noninvasive atrial fibrillation ablation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Tumor-dose-rate variations during robotic radiosurgery of oligo and multiple brain metastases.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia (cardiac radiosurgery) : First-in-patient treatment in Germany.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Oliver BlanckDepartment for Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany ; Saphir Radiosurgery Center, Frankfurt and Güstrow, Germany.
Svenja IpsenRobotics and Cognitive Systems, University of Lübeck.
Mark K ChanDepartment for Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany ; Department for Radiation Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Ralf BauerInstitute for Diagnostics and Interventional Radiology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Germany ; Department for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Matthias KerlInstitute for Diagnostics and Interventional Radiology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Germany ; Radiology, Darmstadt, Germany.
Peter HunoldClinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany.
Volkmar JacobiInstitute for Diagnostics and Interventional Radiology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Germany.
Ralf BruderInstitute for Robotics and Cognitive Systems, University of Lubeck.
Achim SchweikardInstitute for Robotics and Cognitive Systems, University of Luebeck, Institute for Robotics and Cognitive Systems, University of Lubeck.
Dirk RadesDepartment for Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany.
Thomas J VoglInstitute for Diagnostics and Interventional Radiology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Germany.
Peter KleineDepartment for Thoracic, Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University Clinic Frankfurt, Germany.
Frank BodeCardiology Department, Sana Clinic Oldenburg in Holstein.
Jürgen DunstDepartment for Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany ; Department for Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Copenhagen, Denmark.
Klinikum Oldenburg · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DERobotics Research (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRobotic guided stereotactic radiosurgery has recently been investigated for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Before moving into human treatments, multiple implications for treatment planning given a potential target tracking approach have to be considered. MATERIALS &

methodsTheoretical AF radiosurgery treatment plans for twenty-four patients were generated for baseline comparison. Eighteen patients were investigated under ideal tracking conditions, twelve patients under regional dose rate (RDR = applied dose over a certain time window) optimized conditions (beam delivery sequence sorting according to regional beam targeting), four patients under ultrasound tracking conditions (beam block of the ultrasound probe) and four patients with temporary single fiducial tracking conditions (differential surrogate-to-target respiratory and cardiac motion).

resultsWith currently known guidelines on dose limitations of critical structures, treatment planning for AF radiosurgery with 25 Gy under ideal tracking conditions with a 3 mm safety margin may only be feasible in less than 40% of the patients due to the unfavorable esophagus and bronchial tree location relative to the left atrial antrum (target area). Beam delivery sequence sorting showed a large increase in RDR coverage (% of voxels having a larger dose rate for a given time window) of 10.8-92.4% (median, 38.0%) for a 40-50 min time window, which may be significant for non-malignant targets. For ultrasound tracking, blocking beams through the ultrasound probe was found to have no visible impact on plan quality given previous optimal ultrasound window estimation for the planning CT. For fiducial tracking in the right atrial septum, the differential motion may reduce target coverage by up to -24.9% which could be reduced to a median of -0.8% (maximum, -12.0%) by using 4D dose optimization. The cardiac motion was also found to have an impact on the dose distribution, at the anterior left atrial wall; however, the results need to be verified.

conclusionRobotic AF radiosurgery with 25 Gy may be feasible in a subgroup of patients under ideal tracking conditions. Ultrasound tracking was found to have the lowest impact on treatment planning and given its real-time imaging capability should be considered for AF robotic radiosurgery. Nevertheless, advanced treatment planning using RDR or 4D respiratory and cardiac dose optimization may be still advised despite using ideal tracking methods.

Indexed as

4d dose calculationatrial fibrillationcyberknife cardiac radiosurgerydose rate optimizationpulmonary vein isolationstereotactic body radiation therapytreatment planning

Identifiers

PMID27588226
PMCPMC4999353
OpenAlexW2488530012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.