Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27588043›Full record

ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2016

Can positional MRI predict dynamic changes in the medial plantar arch? An exploratory pilot study.

Finn Johannsen, Philip Hansen, Sandra Stallknecht, Michael Skovdal Rathleff, Stine Hangaard, Janus Damm Nybing, Mikael Boesen

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Finn JohannsenInstitute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hospital, Building 8, 1., Bispebjerg Bakke 23, Copenhagen, DK-2400, Denmark.
Philip HansenDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg, Nordre Fasanvej 57, vej 4, opg. 5, Frederiksberg, DK-2000 Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6972-7852
Sandra StallknechtInstitute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hospital, Building 8, 1., Bispebjerg Bakke 23, Copenhagen, DK-2400, Denmark.
Michael Skovdal RathleffResearch Unit for General Practice in Aalborg and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark ; Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Stine HangaardDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg, Nordre Fasanvej 57, vej 4, opg. 5, Frederiksberg, DK-2000 Denmark.
Janus Damm NybingDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg, Nordre Fasanvej 57, vej 4, opg. 5, Frederiksberg, DK-2000 Denmark.
Mikael BoesenDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg, Nordre Fasanvej 57, vej 4, opg. 5, Frederiksberg, DK-2000 Denmark ; The Parker Institute, Department of Rheumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frederiksberg Hospital · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DKAalborg University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPositional MRI (pMRI) allows for three-dimensional visual assessment of navicular position. In this exploratory pilot study pMRI was validated against a stretch sensor device, which measures movement of the medial plantar arch. We hypothesized that a combined pMRI measure incorporating both vertical and medial displacement of the navicular bone induced by loading would be correlated with corresponding stretch sensor measurements.

methods10 voluntary participants were included in the study. Both pMRI and subsequent stretch sensor measurements were performed in a) supine, b) standing and c) standing position with addition of 10 % body weight during static loading of the foot. Stretch sensor measurements were also performed during barefoot walking.

resultsThe total change in navicular position measured by pMRI was 10.3 mm (CI: 7.0 to 13.5 mm). No further displacement occurred when adding 10 % bodyweight (mean difference: 0.7 mm (CI: -0.7 to 2.0 mm), P = 0.29). The total navicular displacement correlated with stretch sensor measurement under static loading conditions (Spearman's rho = 0.66, P = 0.04) but not with measurements during walking (Spearman's rho = 0.58, P = 0.08).

conclusionsTotal navicular bone displacements determined by pMRI showed concurrent validity with stretch sensor measurements but only so under static loading conditions. Although assessment of total navicular displacement by combining concomitant vertical and medial navicular bone movements would appear advantageous compared to monoplanar measurement the combined measure did not seem to predict dynamic changes of the medial foot arch during walking, which are among several possible factors depending on different walking patterns.

Indexed as

AdultAnthropometryCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFootHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePilot ProjectsPostureReproducibility of ResultsSingle-Blind MethodSupine PositionTarsal BonesWeight-BearingYoung AdultMedial plantar archNavicular bonePositional MRIValidity

Identifiers

PMID27588043
PMCPMC5008003
OpenAlexW2508844114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.