Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27588020›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2016

Antimicrobial Proteins and Peptides in Early Life: Ontogeny and Translational Opportunities.

Anna J Battersby, Jasmeet Khara, Victoria J Wright, Ofer Levy, Beate Kampmann

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Skin Barrier Function in Neonates and Infants.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Anna J BattersbyAcademic Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London, UK; Medical Research Council (MRC) Unit, Vaccines and Immunity Theme, Fajara, Gambia.
Jasmeet KharaAcademic Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Victoria J WrightAcademic Paediatrics, Imperial College London , London , UK.
Ofer LevyPrecision Vaccines Program, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Beate KampmannAcademic Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London, UK; Medical Research Council (MRC) Unit, Vaccines and Immunity Theme, Fajara, Gambia.
MRC Unit the Gambia · GMHarvard University · USImperial College London · GBNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_A900_1122Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While developing adaptive immune responses, young infants are especially vulnerable to serious infections, including sepsis, meningitis, and pneumonia. Antimicrobial proteins and peptides (APPs) are key effectors that function as broad-spectrum anti-infectives. This review seeks to summarize the clinically relevant functional qualities of APPs and the increasing clinical trial evidence for their use to combat serious infections in infancy. Levels of APPs are relatively low in early life, especially in infants born preterm or with low birth weight (LBW). There are several rationales for the potential clinical utility of APPs in the prevention and treatment of infections in infants: (a) APPs may be most helpful in those with reduced levels; (b) during sepsis microbial products signal via pattern recognition receptors causing potentially harmful inflammation that APPs may counteract; and (c) in the era of antibiotic resistance, development of new anti-infective strategies is essential. Evidence supports the potential clinical utility of exogenous APPs to reduce infection-related morbidity in infancy. Further studies should characterize the ontogeny of antimicrobial activity in mucosal and systemic compartments, and examine the efficacy of exogenous-APP formulations to inform translational development of APPs for infant groups.

Indexed as

antimicrobial peptidesimmunityinfantinfectioninnatenewbornpeptideprotein

Identifiers

PMID27588020
PMCPMC4989132
OpenAlexW2489415806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.