Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27587971›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of radiology

Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Vertebrobasilar Dissecting Aneurysms: Procedural Outcomes and Factors for Recanalization.

Jin Pyeong Jeon, Young Dae Cho, Jong Kook Rhim, Jeong Jin Park, Won-Sang Cho, Hyun-Seung Kang, Jeong Eun Kim, Gyojun Hwang, O-Ki Kwon, Moon Hee Han

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of radiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. LVIS-within-enterprise double-stent procedure without coiling beneficial as treatment of unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jin Pyeong JeonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon 24253, Korea.
Young Dae ChoDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Jong Kook RhimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju 63241, Korea.
Jeong Jin ParkDepartment of Neurology, Konkuk University Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05030, Korea.
Won-Sang ChoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Hyun-Seung KangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Jeong Eun KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Gyojun HwangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea.
O-Ki KwonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea.
Moon Hee HanDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.; Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRHallym University · KRJeju National University · KRKonkuk University Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOutcomes of stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) have not been well established in the setting of vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms (VBDAs) due to the low percentage of cases that need treatment and the array of available therapeutic options. Herein, we presented clinical and radiographic results of SACE in patients with VBDAs. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 47 patients (M:F, 30:17; mean age ± SD, 53.7 ± 12.6 years), with a VBDA who underwent SACE between 2008 and 2014 at two institutions were evaluated retrospectively. Medical records and radiologic data were analyzed to assess the outcome of SACE procedures. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted to determine the factors that were associated with aneurysmal recanalization after SACE.

resultsStent-assisted coil embolization technically succeeded in all patients. Three cerebellar infarctions occurred on postembolization day 1, week 2, and month 2, but no other procedure-related complications developed. Immediately following SACE, 25 aneurysms (53.2%) showed no contrast filling into the aneurysmal sac. During a mean follow-up of 20.2 months, 37 lesions (78.7%) appeared completely occluded, whereas 10 lesions showed recanalization, 5 of which required additional embolization. Overall recanalization rate was 12.64% per lesion-year, and mean postoperative time to recanalization was 18 months (range, 3-36 months). In multivariable analysis, major branch involvement (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.28; p = 0.013) and the presence of residual sac filling (HR: 8.49, p = 0.044) were identified as statistically significant independent predictors of recanalization. No bleeding was encountered in follow-up monitoring.

conclusionStent-assisted coil embolization appears feasible and safe for treatment of VBDAs. Long-term results were acceptable in a majority of patients studied, despite a relatively high rate of incomplete occlusion immediately after SACE. Major branch involvement and coiled aneurysms with residual sac filling may predispose to recanalization.

Indexed as

StentsAdultAgedAortic DissectionBrain InfarctionEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetreatmentRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAneurysmDissecting aneurysmPosterior circulationStents

Identifiers

PMID27587971
PMCPMC5007409
OpenAlexW2462684393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.